It's not a zero sum game.
Also, those same 20% pay close to 90% of the federal income tax burden -
even though by definition they earn only 20% of the nation's paychecks.
On 11/10/2016 5:26 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Except the top 0.1% are who he's used to dealing with, and they have the
most wealth.
As of 2012, 400 families in America have over half the nation's wealth.
If you look at the top 20% of earners, that's over 80% of the entire
country's wealth. This is almost 5 year old data, projections show that
in 2018, the top 20% will have over 90% of the country's wealth.
On Nov 10, 2016 5:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
lol, a robust economy and wealthier Americans would benefit him much
more than any individual deal or group of deals, he makes his money
off other peoples money, the best way to ensure that happens is to
ensure those people have access to wealth.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
<mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Everything. I mean EVERYTHING is transactional to him. He is
always looking to see how HE will benefit, to heck with anyone
else. I do not see how that will change. We will soon see after
his first major argument in January, February, or March.
I'm betting that he will devolve into insults and innuendo soon
enough.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/10/2016 2:58 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Be interesting to see the evolution. You know he loves the
attention and folks sucking up to him. Can’t think of a
better job for that.
*From:* Josh Reynolds
*Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Logistics
Do you think he would pass up deals of personal relevance though?
On Nov 10, 2016 4:47 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
I think Trump is more immune to influence buying
sweetheart deals than any other president we have had. He
truly has “f*ck you” money and is not beholden to the party.
*From:* Jon Langeler
*Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:40 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Logistics
When you have a non-politician that wins the office, and
with a budget that's less than half of the Democratic
Party, these things are further developed AFTER the win.
That concept itself is a good thing! The problem with
career politicians is they learn 'the system'. And before
you know it, they all do about the same thing. Nothing
changes.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Nov 10, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Bill Prince
<part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't agree with either of those statements. The
trumpster lies because of ignorance. Maybe that's not
quite lying, but perhaps just stupidity. Oh yeah. Let's
get a stupid president. Hell, I've witnessed him telling
one lie in the subject of a statement, and a practically
opposite lie in the predicate. His attention span is too
short to remember where he started.
And if the ACA has helped "no one", what do you call the
22,000,000 people with coverage today?
A lot of negative press has been written about the ACA,
but I haven't heard one, not one, proposal on how to make
it better. Who's fault is that?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/10/2016 8:44 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
It is a matter of the quality of the lies. Trump lies
about himself, his worth, his accomplishments etc. All
driven by his meglomania.
Bill and Hillary are part of an evil global
conglomerate. I am willing to bet they have knocked off
500% more of their enemies than Trump has.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:37 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Logistics
There is also the small matter of the 70-something law
suits (currently) filed against the trumpster. The guy
is a bigger criminal than the Clintons or the Bushes
combined. He also lies a verified 500% more than
Clinton, but everyone chooses to ignore all of that.
Finding lies in the trumpster's statements is a target
rich environment.
Plus the guy only cares about himself. The guy we see
today is nothing more than a narcissist
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism>).
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/10/2016 8:24 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
*From:* Rory Conaway
I’ll bite.
1)Climate change has scientists on both sides of the
argument, both with very good evidence behind them.
The next question is whether it’s man caused which it
partially is, but to what extend.
Pollution bad, irrespective of climate.
2)It’s clear that Hillary and Obama’s policies have
been a massive failure so it’s time to do something
different.
Obama launched more drones with bombs than anyone in
the history of the universe. Hard to tell if this has
been good or bad for us. Will Trump launch them like
Obama? Time will tell. Have we had more attacks on
our homeland with Obama in office? Nothing big and
coordinated like 9/11, that is for certain. Absence of
evidence is not evidence of absence.
3)He didn’t win because of fear, he won because the
Globalists, the corrupt, and the anti-American attitude
in Washington divided this country and were selling out
and destroying our core values. In addition, they were
bankrupting the country at the same time. Liberals
attacked everyone who didn’t like their policies and
half the country said enough was enough.
I think he won because half the country could not stand
the thought of listening to her voice for 4 years.
Kinda like mars attacks. I was going to get a
recording of “Indian Love Call” for protection.
4)Hillary is a lying criminal, Bill a rapist and sexual
predator, and you think Trump has character problems.
Trump does have character problems. He has no filter,
he has no sense of decorum or diplomacy. He is a
megalomaniac. So he doesn’t have good optics. So
what... at least he is new and disruptive. This could
prove to be fun. As for Bill and Hillary, Nixon did
bad things too, lots of them did.
5)Obama is a whole different story. That guy has lied
from the day he took office to his most recent lies
about not knowing about Hillary’s server.
We will never know if the Obama administration
prevented another 9/11 attack or not. I am guessing he
was effective. All upper echelon politicians lie. The
pigs gotta keep the sheep calm.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
*Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:21 AM
*To:* Animal Farm
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Logistics
trump calls climate change a hoax... Forget the physics
or science... Has no foreign policy plan... Sound bites
don't cut it... He won because of fear by biligaana,
period. Country is very divided because he fueled
these fears...
Someone in class yesterday said we should respect
him.... Another guy responded, Really the way he and
others showed respect for Obama...
I can't respect him for his lack of character... I have
stated it clearly..
How ridiculous can he be when his staff cut his tweeter
account days before election? Heaven help us when he
is charge... I noticed no one answered or challenged me
about leaving him alone with your wife or daughters....
The silence was defeaning... And the public works
idea... Who the hell is doing all that work right
now? Open your eyes, visit construction sites around
the southwest and even Las Vegas... Go to job sites....
Facts not bullshit
On Nov 10, 2016 8:00 AM, "Sam Morris"
<w...@csilogan.com> wrote:
If Clinton said it, that in and of itself is enough to
call that statement into question.
On 11/9/2016 12:09 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
Clinton said we can support
600,000 syrian refugees today. Thats 6 percent today of
the undocumented
population we could migrate into citizens...today
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
