So we should now bypass all our APC-type surge suppressors that are
connected to Netonix?

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am going to fix this little problem...
>
> Netonix will fix your port for something like $25
>
> *From:* Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 8:56 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix
>
>
> Yeah. We accidentally hooked up an AF24 through a Cambium surge
> suppressor, and it fragged the port on the Netonix. We were swapping from
> something else that had been on the cable, and completely forgot that it
> was going through that surge suppressor. Hard lesson learned.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 3/24/2017 1:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> OK,  had an exchange with Netonix today.  It is just as Matt Hoppes said.
> You short out their POE and it will blow the Ethernet transformer.
>
> I really presumed they had circuitry like Forrest that could detect and
> shut down in an over current situation.  They do have poly fuses which are
> slow to react and may protect it from a very brief short, but longer shorts
> will indeed harm the port feeding the transformer.
>
> So, Netonix is not active POE.  I would say that on passive POE a plain
> surge suppressor should not be used.  I am working some “non plain” surge
> suppressors now.... ;-)  Stay tuned to this bat channel and a big thanks to
> Matt for forcing me to learn something new.  It was painful, but I can do
> painful things when I have to.
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 10:01 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Netonix
>
> tnx
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 9:47 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Netonix
>
> chris.sisler
> ( A )
> netlinx.net
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>     Anyone know the email for the guy that runs Netonix?
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to