What exactly is the reason? We always run through your surge protectors before connecting to Netonix.
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bypass ALL surge suppressors that are connected to Netonix, irrespective of > manufacturer. > > From: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 5:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix > > So we should now bypass all our APC-type surge suppressors that are connected > to Netonix? > >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am going to fix this little problem... >> >> Netonix will fix your port for something like $25 >> >> From: Bill Prince >> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:56 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix >> >> Yeah. We accidentally hooked up an AF24 through a Cambium surge suppressor, >> and it fragged the port on the Netonix. We were swapping from something else >> that had been on the cable, and completely forgot that it was going through >> that surge suppressor. Hard lesson learned. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >>> On 3/24/2017 1:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: >>> OK, had an exchange with Netonix today. It is just as Matt Hoppes said. >>> You short out their POE and it will blow the Ethernet transformer. >>> >>> I really presumed they had circuitry like Forrest that could detect and >>> shut down in an over current situation. They do have poly fuses which are >>> slow to react and may protect it from a very brief short, but longer shorts >>> will indeed harm the port feeding the transformer. >>> >>> So, Netonix is not active POE. I would say that on passive POE a plain >>> surge suppressor should not be used. I am working some “non plain” surge >>> suppressors now.... ;-) Stay tuned to this bat channel and a big thanks to >>> Matt for forcing me to learn something new. It was painful, but I can do >>> painful things when I have to. >>> >>> From: Chuck McCown >>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 10:01 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix >>> >>> tnx >>> >>> From: Josh Luthman >>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:47 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix >>> >>> chris.sisler >>> ( A ) >>> netlinx.net >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Anyone know the email for the guy that runs Netonix? >>> >>> >> > >
