We are 2:600 One doing installs constantly and the other doing service calls and site maintenance.
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 800:1 with thousands. I think that number would vary allot depending on > network growth etc. The better specs (fade margin) you require to be met on > install the less you will need. > > >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, 4:52 PM Joe Falaschi <listm...@wi.net> wrote: >> We are currently staffed at 500:1. I think a lot of it has to do with the >> age of your network (how many CPE conversions you have to do, removals from >> cancellations, etc) vs a newer company with all new gear and not as much >> chance for a customer base and equipment to age, move away etc. Probably >> the biggest factor is how far out are you booked and is that timeline >> acceptable to you. >> >> Joe >> >> >> >>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 3:19 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>> >> >>> I used to use a 600:1 rule of thumb. >> >>> >>> From: Donnie McCorkle >>> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 2:18 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >> >>> Subject: [AFMUG] How do I decide if we need more technicians? >> >>> This question was posed by one of my managers this week. >>> >>> I told him I’d ask the animal farm and he gave me a strange look…. >>> >>> Is there any ratio of technicians to subscriber that seem to be standard or >>> has worked for you? >>> Any other rational your company uses to decide if your manpower is >>> sufficient? >>> >>> We read an article recently were a startup WISP had 2000 customers before >>> he hired his first employee.. and that sounded pretty wild.
