Hologram network and set up their site to do it for you. Pretty slick. I
also like that is really cheap if you don't use it. As a warning, don't let
the MT put a default route in for it or you will pay huge if your primary
goes down. Otherwise it is so close to free it is crazy.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:30 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:

> Never, but it's not a bad idea to have out of band management? I can get
> the LTE service for $2 a month + data used (ssh data = zero)
>
> TJ
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>
>> Um how often are you loosing contact with your sites to necessitate this
>> LTE backdoor?
>>
>> Seems like a lot of overkill to make routing changes???
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> -sean
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:48 AM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone want to trade a PPTP connection (prefer you are multihomed)
>>> for the purpose of getting through LTE NAT? AKA I assign you a PPTP account
>>> with a static IPV4 and you do the same, so that if either of our networks
>>> go down we can use the others to tunnel back thru LTE to preform OOBM
>>> functions? We can shape @ 1mbps?
>>>
>>> This is a simple was around paying high fees for a static IP from the
>>> wireless carriers that even offer it...
>>>
>>> I don't really want to subscribe to some russian vpn service if I don't
>>> have to, or pay some cloud based OOBM company which will both cost way
>>> big$$$
>>>
>>> TJ
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can use PPTP through NAT on LTE.  You can assign a static private
>>>> IP to both ends of that tunnel.
>>>> If PPTP won't pass something you need, you can run an EoIP tunnel using
>>>> the PPTP IP's as the endpoints of the EoIP tunnel.  You end up with a
>>>> tunnel inside of a tunnel.  It'll have a lowish real MTU, but you can pass
>>>> 1500 bytes within the EoIP tunnel and it'll just be fragmented.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com>
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Sent: 1/31/2018 12:51:40 PM
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] OOBE mikrotik
>>>>
>>>> I was wanting to add out of band management via LTE to some of our core
>>>> routers, but I think most/all cellular networks are NAT now so you cannot
>>>> access your LTE devices inbound unless you have it tunnel out to a public
>>>> ip over VPN somewhere right?
>>>>
>>>> How is everyone handling OOBE?
>>>>
>>>> I'm half tempted to do it via VHF low throughput radios!
>>>>
>>>> TJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to