Alan, would you be interested in emailing me these models? I’m an experienced coder and would love to work on it.
mindpixel at proton mail dot com Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > Alan > > Thank you for your response. I am in no way trying to challenge your personal > research, or view. My questions are genuine and AGI related only. I do not > agree with the view of some here who defend A.T. Murray's position by saying > he at least does something. I agree with your view that it is simply not > enough to just make an effort, therefore AGI would result. The true-AGI > problem is many-fold more complex than we may even imagine. But all efforts > may bring forth new inspiration. > > When compared to aspects of AGI being produced in robotic form today, I have > no idea why Murray et al are trying to reinvent any one of the wheels that > are clearly, already turning. It behooves progress to continually refine the > real questions to be addressed, as you have obviously done. Perhaps, what > would emerge from those efforts would find practical use?However, for its > lack of structured debate between simple and complex systems, I would not be > able to relate to it. That's my definitive view on Murray's world. > > I do not program anymore, but I have been designing computational theory for > system of systems - to purpose - for a long time. AGI, as a holistic > architecture, can be nothing less than a galaxy of deliberate system of > systems, administered by at least 1, superpositioned system of systems. I > have field tested my theoretical designs against real projects and with real > people. The results have been accurate and reliable. The mature models are > ready for programming. > > This is the intelligence (AGI) architecture I am referring to. In my view, it > represents as a fully-recursive, adaptive, intelligence architecture (not > intelligence bootstrapped), which would go a long way towards enabling AGI > functionality, and beyond. Given the appropriate building blocks being put > into place to operate within an intelligence architecture (world), the > functionality you seek would in theory be able to evolve "naturally". Once > programmed into a functional, matured, intelligent system, this may have > potential to serve as a future, AGI hub, or docking station. Such is my > theory. > > According to my analysis, a number of the key components of this intelligence > architecture have already been programmed by other parties, eg., by CISCO, > IBM, MS, GOOGLE, OPENCOG, and so many others in the big-wide world. Such > progress serves to inform me that the overall architecture - formulating in > my mind - still is on the right track. My passion continues as a hobby. I do > it for the fun of it. I'm enjoying the journey. My purpose is not to compete > with the efforts of others, but to indulge my life-long fascination and > curiosity with the technological challenges presented by AGI, and beyond. > > In summary, the one thing needed to solve AGI is, in my opinion, still > lacking in the public domain. > > Rob > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Alan Grimes <alonz...@verizon.net> > Sent: Friday, 08 June 2018 2:55 AM > To: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI > Subject: Re: [agi] The four things needed to solve AGI. > > Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI wrote: >> Alan >> >> I suppose yo already possess a computational framework to process the >> research you are proposing as being critical? In other words, I think >> if you do not have the intelligence architecture, none of the >> functionality would be agi effective. > > I'm missing a number of things that limits my ability to do this > research myself. > > -> a GPU programming framework that actually works on my computer, > preferably OpenCL for portability reasons... > > -> a simulation environment... Microsoft Malmo seems pretty close to > what I want (bare minimum actually), I'll have to take a look at it > again to see if I can make it run the way I need it to. > > -> Everything is in python these days, so I'll need a high quality > manual for the python language. I don't think this documentation > actually exists. In fairness, I haven't made a concerted effort to > search for it recently. on-line courses in the subject only cover the > whitespace-based nesting but basically ignores all other parts of syntax > such as data definition and expression syntax. > > -- > Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com > > Powers are not rights. > [Artificial General Intelligence List](https://agi.topicbox.com/latest) / AGI > / see [discussions](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi) + > [participants](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members) + [delivery > options](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups) > [Permalink](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T507c404b4595c71c-M5774ca24e5367098d2c5ee97) ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T507c404b4595c71c-M38117a6369dd3b24722cb3c1 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups
