First, fix quantum logic: https://web.archive.org/web/20061030044246/http://www.boundaryinstitute.org/articles/Dynamical_Markov.pdf
Then realize that empirically true cases can occur not only in multiplicity (OR), but with structure that includes the simultaneous (AND) measurement dimensions of those cases. But don't tell anyone because it might obviate the risible tradition of so-called "type theories" in both mathematics and programming languages (including SQL and all those "fuzzy logic" kludges) and people would get *really* pissy at you. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:27 AM <ivan.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > What should symbolic approach include to entirely replace neural networks > approach in creating true AI? Is that task even possible? What benefits and > drawbacks we could expect or hope for if it is possible? If it is not > possible, what would be the reasons? > > Thank you all for your time. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-Mf9d9e99b7d5517ff12239b07> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-M4e5f58df19d779da625ab70e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
