Without neural networks, a symbolic approach wouldn't be effective. My view is that, depending on the definition of what "symbolic approach" means in the context of AGI, in the least both such operational schemas would be required to achieve the level of systems abstraction that would satisfy a scientifically-sound (transferable) form of human intelligence. By implication, they would have to be seamlessly integrated. Anyone here working on such an integration?
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:27 PM <ivan.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > What should symbolic approach include to entirely replace neural networks > approach in creating true AI? Is that task even possible? What benefits and > drawbacks we could expect or hope for if it is possible? If it is not > possible, what would be the reasons? > > Thank you all for your time. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-Mf9d9e99b7d5517ff12239b07> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-M2b52d7820d191a6fa0078f55 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
