Historically the AGI community has not really embraced neural networks -- and the cost has been that the AI explosion has come from the mainstream more or less.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:01 PM Quan Tesla <quantes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Without neural networks, a symbolic approach wouldn't be effective. My > view is that, depending on the definition of what "symbolic approach" means > in the context of AGI, in the least both such operational schemas would be > required to achieve the level of systems abstraction that would satisfy a > scientifically-sound (transferable) form of human intelligence. By > implication, they would have to be seamlessly integrated. Anyone here > working on such an integration? > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:27 PM <ivan.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What should symbolic approach include to entirely replace neural networks >> approach in creating true AI? Is that task even possible? What benefits and >> drawbacks we could expect or hope for if it is possible? If it is not >> possible, what would be the reasons? >> >> Thank you all for your time. >> > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-M2b52d7820d191a6fa0078f55> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-M91559e2546f956afaa896d8e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
