John

Rhiemann hypothesis centres at point 0.5, among other things. The cosmology
is underlying, unwavering, constant. Founded on 6 immutable laws only. One
should start there, then derive detailed perspectives, such as these. Else,
one would have to duplicate the foundational argument, infinitely. If the
math checks out (and it does), and interpreted from the correct and
completed global workspaced perspective (context), sense making becomes a
logical result. Thank you for applying your mind to this.

To date, all holistic attempts at defining a plausible cosmos at all scales
have met with abject failure. Theories abound. AI contribute signficantly
to this chaos. However, to illuminate requires the soul architecture and
mental maps in the consciousness of human minds, to weave such a fine
celestial tapestry together. Each of us, contributing in part. Hence,
please contribute. Don't hold back.

Yes, I'm aware we expect monetary regard and recognition for our respective
contributions. However, progress has stalled because of this phenomenon of
social-undemocratization of collective knowledge. Civilization is showing
the stagnation. AI is supposed to be our powerlifter, not our tutor and
problem solver, not our desperation. It offers a way to realign our
progress, to re-obtain our progressive momentum into complex growth,
steered by warm human hearts. We can dispense with collective paranoia and
fear, and progress in hope.

Yet, we criticize so harshly without constructive input, we've become the
problematic code.

Go where you are celebrated. No altruism. No savior roles. No heroism. Just
pure and honest contribution and openness to learn. Be the collective also.

This is not idealism, but part of sustaining our necessary illusion, lest
we drift into false consciousness, and suboptimal realization of life, as
we have been steadily doing.  Find your tribe and be loyal to death unto
them.

This is a rebuild, not a new invention.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 2:18 AM John Rose via AGI <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tuesday, December 02, 2025, at 10:28 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
>
> It ramps up quickly from here onwards.
>
>
> ADEC is an interesting structure though not autopoietic in the traditional
> sense. You can also sieve the primes similarly using a discrete cyclic
> group clocking structure in various ways. I can imagine an electronic or
> physical ADEC-like structure that takes continuous dynamical systems input
> as the hybrid states driver, it would have to agglomerate new elements but
> it could sieve primes and estimate constants using its environment for
> example while floating on ocean waves. Sort of a Taoist compute.
>
> If your calculations are correct though I would wonder why those constants
> semi-appear and cluster in that range and information content.
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M20ace659d3222eff4c570476>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-Mc22a029d0cfc708e5e435bb3
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to