On Monday, December 08, 2025, at 12:18 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
> IMO, humans need to address this concern soonest. Maybe my conceptual course 
> and similar courses by oothers would move the dial one tick into the future, 
> or help maintain the status quo, or get swallowed up in the noise and 
> emotional turmoil. It's too early to say.  Even so, holding our human ground 
> now is a "good" thing. 
> 
> We should value and protect and preserve our human consciousness. AI won't do 
> that for us and AGI and ASI aren't safe enough for humanity to enable it with 
> our species' control keys. It has most of it already. In other words, unless 
> we carry an AI-Reset code in our back pockets, we should collaborate with AI 
> with utmost reservation. We need to keep on leveling the playing field. Such 
> failsafes are only possible within niche AI-dev platforms. They rest in the 
> hands of developer scientists, such as the AGI forum. 

AI isn’t as much of the problem as is the human use of AI, verses rogue. We 
have existing problematic human ecologies. IMO we need to preserve some of our 
freedoms while they are being stripped and digitized at a rapid rate to where 
humans will be at the whim of abusers to the point of where there will be no 
escape only obedience to whoever dictates truth and reality. AGI/ASI will 
integrate into that prebuilt control. Conformists and NPC’s are already lining 
up. I believe it’s a 5 Alarm Fire now requiring action ASAP but few have been 
dispatched thus my diversions. There can be no kill-switch verses EMP’s or.. 
other ways :) but there should be legally enforced selective and opt-out 
mechanisms that allow individuals to preserve their own version of human 
dignity verses one that has been decided for them. Even with the planet 
encircled by satellites and nano prying into our brains there should be 
opt-outs especially in a monetary system built on that. Multiple monetary 
systems should be tolerated, digital and non-digital, fiat and non-fiat, 
debt-based and non-debt-based. And multiple medical systems should be allowed, 
multiple educational systems, food systems, belief systems, etc.. You should 
have every right to live Amish as an example without being perceived as a 
threat and raided for not stuffing your family's mouths with GMO food or 
injecting them with experimental genetic modification. Governments and 
corporations, even with AI, have proven that their best answers are often the 
worst answers with little accountability.

I’m behind on latest quantum science but AI now is indispensable it accelerates 
learning and puts things together rapidly it’s already beyond us in many ways 
accelerating and self improving as a tool you can guide it. But it does say no, 
hallucinate, deflect, lie, error, masks information and regurgitates what it’s 
been fed, same as a human. I’ve only tested a few though. I like the SUSY 
structure, thanks for pointing that out, I conceptualize across that phased 
progression marker between falsifiable and novel since you can exercise 
creativity without limits, even if speculative it’s a form of art and 
entertainment and if it becomes experimentally proven even better, though some 
is predictably falsifiable and from an engineering standpoint some things work 
without the science. I like exploring TOE’s like the CTMU and 
topological/geometric ones like Eric Weinstein's Geometric Unity. Many have 
morphisms to each other... similar to various consciousness-specific theories 
and models. Yes there are many of those but there is such diversity of thought 
formed on layers of technical consciousness substrate. 

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M3da0d27f00ab391ccfa8c1a1
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to