John, I agree. I'm certain there were times when my eyes literally crossed
over to comprehend such constructs. But, it is comprehensible, no
mysticism. Pure, falsifiable science.

A version of the completed description of the wavefunction and its
3-layered lattice has been derived. Consciousness could now be
mathematically explained. It integrates perfectly with Orch-OR theory, down
to the last prediction.

Accordingly, all of Earth's existence flows from a brief moment in 5D, no
SM violation, when the wavefunction completes the last few milliseconds of
its superdeterministic pattern and achieves a brief, but explosive state of
SUSY.

This mechanism seeded the elements. It seeds Earth and the solar system. It
is the autopoietic time and record keeper of all qualia, vibrations, and
informational contexts. Among other things, it's self referentual,
recursive, operating in o particular lattice as entangled local and
nonlocal "memory".

No, not just in service of consciousness, but also the emergence of
exponentially-complex lifeforms, some with the bio-physical architectures
to exist in conscious states and provisioning atomic building blocks.

This is Earth's history, the meaningfulness of purposeful existence. It
explains how it all flows together. It answers the hardest of questions and
exposes the foolishness of invented "scientific" explanations, which much
of Western society is founded upon.

I see no good reason why a concept of this mechanism should not be taught
in schools and celebrated as our natural heritage.

I see no good reason why humans should not be taught how to use their full
brain architecture for consciousness expression in a local and nonlocal
sense.

In the face of provable science, esoterics and mysticism may fade into
their proper perspectives. Gnostic living may even return in the open.
Nature may again be regarded as home and nurtured. The justification for
dangerous and abominable experimentation would cease.

Bad reasons? Plenty, but no good reasons for keeping the truth from science
and other truth seekers.

On Fri, 05 Dec 2025, 15:45 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thursday, December 04, 2025, at 4:25 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
>
> Rhiemann hypothesis centres at point 0.5, among other things. The
> cosmology is underlying, unwavering, constant. Founded on 6 immutable laws
> only. One should start there, then derive detailed perspectives, such as
> these. Else, one would have to duplicate the foundational argument,
> infinitely. If the math checks out (and it does), and interpreted from the
> correct and completed global workspaced perspective (context), sense making
> becomes a logical result. Thank you for applying your mind to this.
>
> To date, all holistic attempts at defining a plausible cosmos at all
> scales have met with abject failure. Theories abound. AI contribute
> signficantly to this chaos. However, to illuminate requires the soul
> architecture and mental maps in the consciousness of human minds, to weave
> such a fine celestial tapestry together. Each of us, contributing in part.
> Hence, please contribute. Don't hold back.
>
>
> Lossless compression as the minimization of mathematical expressions of
> numbers, with symbol re-representation, takes you to some strange places
> like the primes and observer. Given a block of data, a file, as a large
> integer, a point, note the base, forget about the data, take the point and
> express the point. Any point. All points. The human mind is tapped into
> something, there is a relationship there with the universe via
> consciousness. The past is accessible. What you are researching is related
> to the technicals of that, I think. That connection, what is it... but it
> has a communication protocol, and it must be high frequency, not sure of
> the bandwidth, alphabet and symbol complexity.. though I'm confident it can
> be worked out. But devices that interface exist it's just that they are
> undemocratized. Maybe for good reasons.
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-Me1a5fbb466157ae72bc48ffb>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M4a1f8c5150e9847616ce6241
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to