On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My point is: the filibuster rule is not a dependent action, according to > rule 1728. Therefore, if it works at all, it works due to the ordinary > English meaning of what it says. "with 2 supporting Senators" is with 2 > supporting Senators, no firstclassness mentioned or implied anywhere...
"with 2 supporting Senators" == "with 2 Support; supporters must be Senators" -root
