> This danger doesn't even sound plausible to me. Everyone's confused and goes > home, and never comes back? I doubt it.
I won't have a keyboard for a few hours but in short, Do you have a plan to return your version of Agora to normalcy reasonably soon? If so, that would be reassuring, modulo other concerns; my main issue here is that unlike any other dictator I can remember, you have attempted to break the game without describing any such plan. Note that I argued in favor of the last attempt to significantly modify the rules via dictatorship. (But that purported dictator did not attempt to break CFJs, and was found to have been unsuccessful.) >> but since claiming unilateral judgement, especially in this format, >> does not particularly /aid/ your chances of being accepted, but >> merely sows discord, I consider it unfortunate that you have elected >> to do so. > > Well, my style is entirely consistent with how I've been ruling on CFJs right > from the get go, which admittedly has only been 3, but still. So I don't > understand this bit either. I considered the existence of the judgement considerably more important than its style Sent from my iPhone
