On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > It has already been determined that Japanese acceptable. > > No it hasn't. > > It's been found true in a very limited way for nicknames and registration, > but for nicknames and registration we give much wider latitude than for > other legal matters. > > But CFJ 1460 is still the guiding precedent, and has been cited in several > follow-up cases, and is still in operation. > > CFJ 1460 is worth a read. It's clearly-written on first principles, and > fairly robust to ruleset changes of the last 15 years: > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1460 > > The only complication is whether advances in machine-translation have > reached > the point where translations are so transparent as to be unambiguous, and > as > seen by CFJ 3478, that generally hasn't happened. > > > Are there any pending CFJ's regarding Organization 蘭亭社? I don't see any, but I did join after the organization was already chartered so I'd rather be sure.
