Chris Bilson pointed me to this today: http://www.csscript.net/

<http://www.csscript.net/>Pretty damn close to what I want.

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Tim Erickson <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is probably not what you're talking about, but I like Snippet
> Compiler <http://www.sliver.com/dotnet/SnippetCompiler/>, and would love
> something like that combined with better IntelliSense, support for
> WinForms/WPF/Silverlight/ASP.NET, etc, the capacity to optionally handle
> multiple files, and....
>
> Oh, wait!  I have something like that.  It's called Visual Studio with R#!
>
> Seriously, though, VS's solution and project files are a pain sometimes,
> but I'm not sure what the better options are.
>
> Convention over configuration?
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Howard Dierking <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>   I’m working on a blog post at the moment to document the insane hoops
>> we had to jump through in order to get our build automation in place for an
>> Umbraco extension solution.  VS and .sln files were (as you might expect)
>> one of the central problems we had to overcome.
>>
>> _howard
>>
>>  *From:* Justin Bozonier <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:23 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: Screw You VS Project and Solution Files!
>>
>> I'll give you both that... There's something between VS and NotePad...
>> Some people like Vim or Emacs, Textmate, etc... So yeah. With y'all there.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Eric Ridgeway <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I am with Charlie on a lot of this. I joke often about just using notepad
>>> but that's not something I really would want to do. I would be inclined for
>>> a "visual studio: the good parts" edition however. Preferably a light weight
>>> stand alone editor with good refactoring help (mostly for speed). I've been
>>> doing a little bit of spiking fun in linqpad lately and using the c# program
>>> template to try a few things out, along with trying a little F#. This feels
>>> a lot like what I would prefer to use. An environment I could easily drop on
>>> a thumb drive and go to town with.
>>>
>>> Just some thoughts on the topic.
>>>  On Nov 16, 2010 8:05 PM, "Charlie Poole" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Well of course you *can* work with just notepad and the SDK.
>>> >
>>> > Personally, I'd prefer a better editor than notepad though.
>>> >
>>> > Charlie
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Justin Bozonier <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> What if we could develop .NET programs without any IDE... just Notepad
>>> >> and a heart filled with hope? It'd be hawt that's what!
>>> >>
>>> >> I've been ruminating on why I feel so much more productive in Ruby
>>> >> land and on how I can bring some of that to the MS development stack.
>>> >> One of the big pain points for me is Visual Studio and all of its
>>> >> project and solution files.
>>> >>
>>> >> At first I thought it was the fact Ruby doesn't compile.. That's nice
>>> >> but not **huge**... Python compiles after all... Then I realized one
>>> >> of the big things Visual Studio (along with R#) helps me do is find my
>>> >> classes and files. I've seen leaning on Visual Studio cause an
>>> >> enormous loss of cohesion across packages which forms a self-
>>> >> reinforcing cycle of needing even more Visual Studio packagement.
>>> >>
>>> >> This is an experiment I've been working with over the past couple
>>> >> research days that was a thought of what could be done to reduce that
>>> >> pain. It's a Ruby script you can run in a folder to compile all c#
>>> >> files and execute them as though they were a set of scripts and
>>> >> modules. It's VERY simplistic and I only consider it a proof of
>>> >> concept but still I'd like to hear some of your thoughts on this.
>>> >> Ideally, I'd like to be able to develop an entire C# application only
>>> >> using this technique.
>>> >>
>>> >> You can get a rough idea of what's going on inside the tests but I did
>>> >> a bad job testing. So ask questions if you got 'em.
>>> >>
>>> >> Anyone else with thoughts on this or other ways of doing truly
>>> >> "Alt" .NET development? :)
>>> >>
>>> >> The git: https://github.com/jcbozonier/IronLove
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> mailto:altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>>
>>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> mailto:altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>>
>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> --
>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> mailto:altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to