Didn't mean to send yet. It has actually been implemented at least once: http://www.coderun.com/
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ian Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > A web based IDE seems like a good fit with the "compiler as a service" > concept. But what would the lag be... > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Tim Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Web-based IDE anyone? How about REST-based project/solution API (whether >> files, classes, resources, or otherwise)? Integrated directly with Github? >> >> Wanna develop in the console? Use a Lynx-like browser? >> >> And the more I think about it, the more I like the thought of a >> convention-based project/solution structure a la Java. >> >> That being said, I'm pretty damn comfortable editing .csproj files >> anymore, and honestly have come across multiple situations where I'm not >> sure simple filesystem or path-based conventional project architecture would >> have been able to cut it. Think of including a .cs file as a non-compiled >> resource and wanting to be able to see it next to a compiled .cs file >> because they're logically related. >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Ted Neward <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> e is “not great”, at least, not out of the box. I’ve been using it for a >>> while now as the editor of choice during coding demos, and it’s color-syntax >>> support (among other things) leaves a fair amount to be desired. Granted, I >>> haven’t spent a lot of time experimenting with tweaking/editing the TextMate >>> bundles, but I don’t want to spend weeks customizing an editor if the bundle >>> for doing something relatively straightforward (color-syntax highlighting >>> for Java, for example) doesn’t get it right. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ted Neward >>> >>> Java, .NET, XML Services >>> >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing >>> >>> http://www.tedneward.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Eric Ridgeway >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:29 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: Screw You VS Project and Solution Files! >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah I think vim, emacs, textmate, e .... are moving all toward the right >>> direction if not already there... think I personally need to spend more time >>> with them... >>> >>> On Nov 16, 2010 8:23 PM, "Justin Bozonier" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > I'll give you both that... There's something between VS and NotePad... >>> Some >>> > people like Vim or Emacs, Textmate, etc... So yeah. With y'all there. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Eric Ridgeway <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I am with Charlie on a lot of this. I joke often about just using >>> notepad >>> >> but that's not something I really would want to do. I would be >>> inclined for >>> >> a "visual studio: the good parts" edition however. Preferably a light >>> weight >>> >> stand alone editor with good refactoring help (mostly for speed). I've >>> been >>> >> doing a little bit of spiking fun in linqpad lately and using the c# >>> program >>> >> template to try a few things out, along with trying a little F#. This >>> feels >>> >> a lot like what I would prefer to use. An environment I could easily >>> drop on >>> >> a thumb drive and go to town with. >>> >> >>> >> Just some thoughts on the topic. >>> >> On Nov 16, 2010 8:05 PM, "Charlie Poole" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > Well of course you *can* work with just notepad and the SDK. >>> >> > >>> >> > Personally, I'd prefer a better editor than notepad though. >>> >> > >>> >> > Charlie >>> >> > >>> >> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Justin Bozonier < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> What if we could develop .NET programs without any IDE... just >>> Notepad >>> >> >> and a heart filled with hope? It'd be hawt that's what! >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I've been ruminating on why I feel so much more productive in Ruby >>> >> >> land and on how I can bring some of that to the MS development >>> stack. >>> >> >> One of the big pain points for me is Visual Studio and all of its >>> >> >> project and solution files. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> At first I thought it was the fact Ruby doesn't compile.. That's >>> nice >>> >> >> but not **huge**... Python compiles after all... Then I realized >>> one >>> >> >> of the big things Visual Studio (along with R#) helps me do is find >>> my >>> >> >> classes and files. I've seen leaning on Visual Studio cause an >>> >> >> enormous loss of cohesion across packages which forms a self- >>> >> >> reinforcing cycle of needing even more Visual Studio packagement. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> This is an experiment I've been working with over the past couple >>> >> >> research days that was a thought of what could be done to reduce >>> that >>> >> >> pain. It's a Ruby script you can run in a folder to compile all c# >>> >> >> files and execute them as though they were a set of scripts and >>> >> >> modules. It's VERY simplistic and I only consider it a proof of >>> >> >> concept but still I'd like to hear some of your thoughts on this. >>> >> >> Ideally, I'd like to be able to develop an entire C# application >>> only >>> >> >> using this technique. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> You can get a rough idea of what's going on inside the tests but I >>> did >>> >> >> a bad job testing. So ask questions if you got 'em. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Anyone else with thoughts on this or other ways of doing truly >>> >> >> "Alt" .NET development? :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> The git: https://github.com/jcbozonier/IronLove >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> >> >> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> <altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> . >>> >> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> . >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> <altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> . >>> >> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> <altnetseattle%[email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> . >>> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<altnetseattle%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Ian Davis > http://innovatian.com > -- Ian Davis http://innovatian.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
