Hi,

How about an option to assign pressing the PHONE button to launch my
app ?
(when there are no pending incoming calls)

TIA


On Jan 10, 2:35 am, "Dianne Hackborn" <hack...@android.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to have a way to replace the incoming call screen or other
> parts of the incoming call handling, but it is pretty non-trivial to do.  I
> am not aware of any current work going on to do this.  You can have a look
> at the source and see what is involved.
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brad Fuller <bradallenful...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks Dianne,
>
> > Then perhaps there are ways to implement "partial" events for incoming
> > calls. When an incoming call is detected, I imagine that there are
> > several separate events. For example: get the number of the incoming
> > call; see if it's in the contact list; display the onscreen graphic of
> > an incoming with the phone number and the contact name, call the
> > ringtone manager: etc. Then, when the phone is off-hook, display "Call
> > in progess" text.. etc.
>
> > I assume that these are separate classes. So, could one display their
> > own "incoming call" graphic? Or replace the RingTone manager (not the
> > ringtone, like ExtendedRings does), etc?  Or are they not separate
> > classes or all private?
>
> > Does that make sense?
>
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Dianne Hackborn <hack...@android.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Currently you can intercept outgoing calls and replace that with your own
> > > behavior, but we don't yet have a way to intercept incoming calls.
>
> > > The issue of built-in apps using internal APIs is kind-of a red-herring.
> > > Yes, in the case of the phone UI, there are a bunch of APIs that you need
> > to
> > > be able to implement something like your own in-call screen...  however
> > the
> > > fact that they are internal is not really the issue: we could expose
> > them,
> > > but it still wouldn't work because the current implementation of them
> > > requires that you actually be running in the same process as the
> > telephony
> > > subsystem, so they just can't be used by other apps.  For the most part,
> > we
> > > make APIs private because they are not yet something we can maintain in
> > the
> > > future platform are even able to be used successfully by applications.
> >  Not
> > > out of some malicious goal to make sure nobody else can make their own
> > > whatever UI.
>
> > > Outside of the phone system, for the most part the platform applications
> > use
> > > private APIs because we didn't have time to clean all of the apps up as
> > we
> > > were evolving the official SDK into something that we could support in
> > the
> > > long term.  We would love to accept patches that fix these APIs to switch
> > to
> > > the public APIs.
>
> > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Brad Fuller <bradallenful...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, moazzamk <moazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > I don't know what you mean by replace with your own code but you can
> > >> > setup a receiver in your app which is called when a call is received.
> > >> > I remember reading about it in the documentation (if I remember
> > >> > correctly).
>
> > >> What I mean is that instead of the default process that happens when
> > >> an incoming call is detected, another process is called.
>
> > --
> > Brad Fuller
>
> --
> Dianne Hackborn
> Android framework engineer
> hack...@android.com
>
> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> provide private support.  All such questions should be posted on public
> forums, where I and others can see and answer them.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to