add the CALL_BUTTON intent filter with category DEFAULT On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:11 AM, shimo...@gmail.com <shimo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Hi, > > What ?! > > I was told at these forums it can not be done for the PHONE button... > > How ? > Is it the same code as for the camera button ? > What permissions are needed ? > > If I can do this it would be a GREAT feature for my app ! > > On Jan 12, 4:40 am, "Dianne Hackborn" <hack...@android.com> wrote: > > I believe you can already do that. > > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:23 AM, shimo...@gmail.com <shimo...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > How about an option to assign pressing the PHONE button to launch my > > > app ? > > > (when there are no pending incoming calls) > > > > > TIA > > > > > On Jan 10, 2:35 am, "Dianne Hackborn" <hack...@android.com> wrote: > > > > It would be nice to have a way to replace the incoming call screen or > > > other > > > > parts of the incoming call handling, but it is pretty non-trivial to > do. > > > I > > > > am not aware of any current work going on to do this. You can have a > > > look > > > > at the source and see what is involved. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brad Fuller < > bradallenful...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Dianne, > > > > > > > Then perhaps there are ways to implement "partial" events for > incoming > > > > > calls. When an incoming call is detected, I imagine that there are > > > > > several separate events. For example: get the number of the > incoming > > > > > call; see if it's in the contact list; display the onscreen graphic > of > > > > > an incoming with the phone number and the contact name, call the > > > > > ringtone manager: etc. Then, when the phone is off-hook, display > "Call > > > > > in progess" text.. etc. > > > > > > > I assume that these are separate classes. So, could one display > their > > > > > own "incoming call" graphic? Or replace the RingTone manager (not > the > > > > > ringtone, like ExtendedRings does), etc? Or are they not separate > > > > > classes or all private? > > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Dianne Hackborn < > hack...@android.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Currently you can intercept outgoing calls and replace that with > your > > > own > > > > > > behavior, but we don't yet have a way to intercept incoming > calls. > > > > > > > > The issue of built-in apps using internal APIs is kind-of a > > > red-herring. > > > > > > Yes, in the case of the phone UI, there are a bunch of APIs that > you > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > > be able to implement something like your own in-call screen... > > > however > > > > > the > > > > > > fact that they are internal is not really the issue: we could > expose > > > > > them, > > > > > > but it still wouldn't work because the current implementation of > them > > > > > > requires that you actually be running in the same process as the > > > > > telephony > > > > > > subsystem, so they just can't be used by other apps. For the > most > > > part, > > > > > we > > > > > > make APIs private because they are not yet something we can > maintain > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > future platform are even able to be used successfully by > > > applications. > > > > > Not > > > > > > out of some malicious goal to make sure nobody else can make > their > > > own > > > > > > whatever UI. > > > > > > > > Outside of the phone system, for the most part the platform > > > applications > > > > > use > > > > > > private APIs because we didn't have time to clean all of the apps > up > > > as > > > > > we > > > > > > were evolving the official SDK into something that we could > support > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > long term. We would love to accept patches that fix these APIs > to > > > switch > > > > > to > > > > > > the public APIs. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Brad Fuller < > > > bradallenful...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, moazzamk <moazz...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > I don't know what you mean by replace with your own code but > you > > > can > > > > > >> > setup a receiver in your app which is called when a call is > > > received. > > > > > >> > I remember reading about it in the documentation (if I > remember > > > > > >> > correctly). > > > > > > > >> What I mean is that instead of the default process that happens > when > > > > > >> an incoming call is detected, another process is called. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Brad Fuller > > > > > > -- > > > > Dianne Hackborn > > > > Android framework engineer > > > > hack...@android.com > > > > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time > to > > > > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on > public > > > > forums, where I and others can see and answer them. > > > > -- > > Dianne Hackborn > > Android framework engineer > > hack...@android.com > > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > > forums, where I and others can see and answer them. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
