You'd think they could think of another way to keep developer accounts
"authentic" besides charging money.  That's the "Something Awful
forums" method, and it's a poor way to do it.  For example, how about
dedicating some automated tools, and some part-time human resources,
to monitoring app distribution activity and ban "inauthentic"
accounts?  I don't even know what constitutes an "inauthentic" account
anyway.

I'm so happy with so many things about the Android environment, I
really wish this fee wasn't here, especially for people who want to
just *give away* apps for *free*.

I don't want to charge people anything, so I shouldn't have to pay
anything.  The mobile Internet shouldn't differ so sharply from the
"real" Internet.  I'm getting angrier the longer this email gets, so I
should end it here.

-- Eric

On Oct 23, 2:39 am, blindfold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mind the $25 too much even though I write freeware, but it
> annoys a bit given the valuable feedback that many developers have
> given to help Android mature, which is decisive for its success. If
> the issue is to make sure that accounts are legitimate, Google could
> do a refund after you paid that $25. That would be a sympathetic
> gesture towards developers. Hey, they could even quadruple that $25
> refund. ;-)
>
> On Oct 23, 4:10 am, JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sounds like per account. I am guessing this is just to make sure the
> > account is legitimate. They pay dirt to have some guy in a third world
> > country type in CAPTCHAs these days...
>
> > With money-exchange apps not starting before the 1st quarter 09, Shane
> > and Al got a real nice opening there.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to