Thanks, Eliott
Quick questions:
a) Would those Fairhair devices ever be transit nodes ("routers") in the
network itself ? Or even when only being leafs of the topology,
would they intend to run RPL ?
b) Any specific way how these devices get their IP (IPv6 ?) addresses ?
I am wondering, because i wonder how much more anima than bootstrap could
be applicable to Fairhair devices.
Cheers
Toerless
In-Reply-To: <4108581b-d6b8-b284-eb26-d3c047372...@cisco.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Dear authors of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra and WG,
>
> The Fairhair alliance focuses on lighting and building automation. Our
> security team has been reviewing your draft, and we appreciate the
> effort that you are devoting in this direction. We would just like to
> highlight at this junction that there is a preference for device
> communications from the autonomic device to the registrar to be via COAP
> over DTLS rather than HTTP over TLS, primarily because the devices that
> we are working with will already have a CoAP implementation. As such,
> there is some interest in draft-pritikin-coap-bootstrap-03.txt. We look
> forward to seeing that work further developed.
>
> On behalf of the Fairhair security subgroup,
>
> Eliot
>
> ps: as usual, I will encourage fairhair members to directly chime in
> with their own views on this matter.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
