On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:36:12PM +0200, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > The sharing instead of deep-copying Tcl_Objs is MT-issue which can > be solved generally by getting the string rep of the Tcl_Obj and > copying the string rep only but maintaining the object type.
Ah, so that's the part that is different between the single and multi threaded cases, and presumably why the single-threaded case was fast enough for a "clone a new interp to service each request" on a Cisco router? Here's a naive, clueless-because-I-have-not-read-the-source question: Is some sort of copy-on-write feasible, for the multi-threaded case? Or would it even help, if it was possible? -- Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.piskorski.com/ -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
