Am 27.05.2005 um 00:47 schrieb Jeff Hobbs:
This I will disagree with. If you can handle it all in C, I think you will save time. A lot will be in the copying itself, but saving any and all parsing is a bonus.
Hmmm...since the scripts will have to jump interp/thread, they need to be re-parsed from source to bytecodes again, don't they? If this is true, then what is actually saved? I do also believe that C-coded clone-routine will be faster than doing it all from Tcl alone but I'm afraid that it still will be too slow when it comes to duplicating a potentially large (i.e. heaviliy loaded) interp. Again, I still believe that some kind of lazy-loading plus usage of slave interp and clever aliasing could be the way to go if people need the 100% cleanness. But, as we all know, speed i.e. performance is best tested (and judged) by trials and experimentation. Zoran -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
