Hello, On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christian Boltz <appar...@cboltz.de> wrote:
> Hello, > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 schrieb Kshitij Gupta: > > @Christian First off, what mail client do you use? I'd like to be able > > to have my replies like you all do. > > Nearly every mail client supports this style to reply (even Outlook ;-) > The main "trick" is to insert your reply in the middle of the quoted > mail instead of typing at the first line. > > I'm using KMail, but the current version has some known issues caused by > the switch to Akonadi and Nepomuk. If you want to use KMail, make sure > to have the latest KDE version to see less bugs ;-) > > Thunderbird might be another option. It's the mail client I usually > recommend to windows users ;-) (because they can't use KMail) > > Ahh, that trick's pretty neat. I'm on GNOME though I have the KMail app. I'll give it a shot. :-) Meanwhile, lets see if the "trick" works on Gmail. ;-) > Back to topic at hand, the config wrapper has two additional functions > > besides the read and write (which also sets the permissions for the > > profiles). So, for the time being I'll keep redo the config file with > > the configprofiler module and if later on I can rather easily do-away > > with the config library file if its not needed (though I'll note down > > this point because I might forget it later on). > > OK, additional functions are a good argument for a wrapper. > > > Okay, I'll go through the roadmap once again and then setup the > > wikipage for my roadmap. (Any naming ideas for the wikipage?) > > Why not just something simple like "Profile generation tools"? > That said, the page name is not too important - and we can still > move/rename the page if we find a better name ;-) > > > Also, a > > new name for the library tools package (If we're moving away from > > Immunix)? ;-) > > I'd just use "AppArmor". > > Okay, I'll have some content from my proposal moved over to a wiki page as soon as possible. > > As, for the code review John went into the docstrings and comments > > which I quite agree too, since Python code in general is pretty > > readable in general so a few explanatory comments should be > > sufficient. But I suppose a few lines of docstring will not harm (and > > Comments and documentation never harm, and having a short summary of > what a function does and how to call it is always helpful. > > There's nothing wrong with reading the source, but for a quick overview > a good comment is quite helpful ;-) > > > will be useful when importing the modules, since AppArmor.py will be > > pretty long). > > That sounds like you might want to split it into several files ;-) > > That is going to be the hardest part I imagine, so breaking down that file reasonably is a good idea. I plan to get started with it by the next week. (Had been off the work for the last couple of days) > > I'll take that the coding style for those few lines was > > okay to everyone? ;-) > > Yes :-) > > > I think I love the blogpost about the weekly progress idea, so > > hopefully I'll try to follow that (Does anyone want me to setup a new > > blog for the sole-purpose?). > > Just use your existing blog - it will give you some additional readers, > and if you are lucky, they'll stay for more than the GSoC period. > > Yeah, I could use some readers and get regular with blogging. :-) > > Looks good enough to me, I'll setup my IRC client for that. We have a > > variety of timezones (mine being UTC+5:30), though gladly I don't > > quite have issues with time since, I spend much of my day (and night) > > near my computer. :-D > > I'd say we can probably meet in what you call "night" and I call > "evening" ;-) > The time of the monthly AppArmor meetings is 20:00 UTC, which might be a > bit too late for you (it would start at 1:30 in your timezone if my > calculation is right). > > If you like IRC discussions after midnight, we can do the weekly > meetings at 20:00 UTC, but 18:30 or 19:00 UTC would also be possible for > me. Would that work better for you? > @John: what about you? > > For our weekly meetings, I'm perfectly okay with anything around 19:00 since I dont expect the discussions to last over 2-3 hours, which isnt that late given my routine. > > I'll try to be present in the next meeting. BTW, anything on the > > agenda requiring my presence? > > Not yet ;-) but often we discuss more things than initially planned, and > those discussions that typically start with a "BTW" can be quite > interesting ;-) > > @John no, you dont need to move the schedule for the AppArmor meeting, I'll be available at that time. :-) > > @Christian Sorry for the sig, I wasnt aware of the extra space and I'm > > No problem ;-) > > > glad you liked my first sig. :-) I'll probably build myself a > > collection of those too. > > If you are interested in the scripts I'm using: > http://cboltz.de/en/linux/zufallssig/ > Nothing magic, but it can save you from re-inventing the wheel ;-) > Actually, I was gonna script that myself. But I'll probably I'll put that off until later and use that. :-) Regards, Kshitij Gupta > > > Regards, > > Christian Boltz -- > > bei Bernd ist alles Zufall. > Glaubst Du nicht, dass da Kristallkugel.pl zugeschlagen hat? Ich bin mir > sicher, dass Bernd sowas auf seinem Rechner hat ;-) > [> Michael Schulz u. Manfred Tremmel über Bernd Brodesser in suse-linux] > > > -- > AppArmor mailing list > AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor >
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
