A big yes to in-depth discussions and criticism too but not when the criticisim
is in the form of "Omkara deserved the filmfare for Best Music more than Rang
De and TZP more than Guru".
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, Chord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Chord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arr] it is easy to break harmony
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 19, 2008, 3:41 AM
Don't see anything wrong in expressing passion for ARR and his
music,
but I agree that this group could use some more in depth discussions
of his music and to accept criticism better. I think this group has
become progressively younger over time, hence the differences.
--- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, V S Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> On 7/18/2008 8:26 PM India Time, _Vinayakam Murugan_ wrote:
>
> > Is it a prerequisite that members here should be ARR fans only. I am
> > proud to say that I am a fan of ARR, RD Burman, OP Nayyar, SD Burman,
> > Ilayaraja, MS Vishwanathan, MadanMohan, Vishal Bharadwaj, Shankar /
> > Ehsaan / Loy , Colonial Cousins, Kailasa, etc etc.
> >
>
>
> Same here.
>
> how this list has lost its character in last 10 years. Now, it has
> become mandatory to just praise ARR.
>
> Information is mostly being exchanged about ARR's trivia, whom he met,
> where he went, what he did, what he said about someone, what someone
> said about him.
>
> Apart from that, you are free to praise ARR endlessly.
>
> There is no real analysis of his music. reviews of music and movies are
> picked from the sites in dozens and hundreds and posted here. Any
> reviewer having said the slightest negative thing about the music is
> painted "he is always like that".
>
> Members are posting not that many review and nowhere in that depth as
> members were posting 10 years ago. members reviews give 8+ or 9+ out of
> 10 rating to each and every song. Any member saying a negative thing
> about music is terms a Yuvan or Deva or IR's spy who came to destroy
> this forum.
>
> Anybody who has read Animal Farm by George Orwell might identify the
> changes in the nature of this list. Thank God that things have not
> reached George Orwell's 1984 level.
>
> Seems more fresh air is needed here or there is no fun in remaining
here.
>
> --
> V
>
