I disagree with most of your post and whether the masses accept this or not has not yet been determined. I'm glad it's getting good reviews overall. I also think it's unfair to compare albums from different times and films.
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Jahanzeb Farooq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > man you have to accept it. although it is growing on us and we have > started liking more compared to the first time, but the fact remains > that it is not something liked by the masses. only one song Tu meri > dost would be liked by the masses but not the rest. even recent ARR > albums had many songs loved by masses (and critics) e.g., Tere bina, > Mayya mayya, Barso re (Guru), Pappu, Aditi, Kahin to (JTYJN) etc etc. > Furthermore the fact remains that Yuvvraaj does not have even a single > song which can be called just mibdblowing or plain awesome as per the > ARR standards etc. comparing to Taal it still remains a HUGE > disappointment, if not for us (ARR fans) certainly it is for masses. > the weakest songs of Dil se, Taal or Bombay are still better than > strongest song/s of Yuvvraaj. > > lets analyze it. Mastam mastam is good, it grows, melody is Rahmanish, > Sonu is perfect, but again it is not something instantly loved by > masses. Zindagi is again good but nothing exceptional. it heavily > relies on vocals, too little music, no traditional ARR interludes etc. > Man mohini is very good but alas too short, which is completely un- > understandable, why did not ARR put a few more minutes to it??? > strange. Dil ka risha is very good again, orchestra is great. it would > be loved more than Zindagi, Mastam, Man mohini by masses. however it > is a very situational song, not something you will find people humming > or playing on streets etc. Shano shano is one of the weakest songs of > ARR ever, people will not find anything special in it. it is not very > different than dozens of Pritam and others' songs releasing every day. > even Pappu (JTYJN) was far far far far far far better. so at the end > the only song remains is Tu muskura which will be liked by the masses > but again there is nothing very special in it. it is likable but not > something blockbuster etc. it is in the league of recent Tu bin bataye > (RDB) and Milo wahan wahan (Ada) though the two were far far better. > just think of some of ARR's biggest hits and ask yourself honestly can > we compare any of Yuvvraaj's songs with Satrangi, Dil se, Chaiyyan > chaiyyan (Dil se) Taal se taal, ishq bina, ramta jogi (Taal), Kehna hi > kya, Hamma hamma, Tu hi re (Bombay) and those from Rangeela, Saathiya, > Lagaan, Roja, Sapnay etc etc or even recent lesser hits rang de > basanti (RDB), khwaja mere khwaja, azeem-o-shaan (JA) etc and those > from Guru etc. and you will get the answer. > > hence i am certainly not surprised by the reactions of masses. ARR > here really disappointed, because of Ghai-ARR combo people were > expecting something as fantastic as Taal, but there is no comparison > between Taal and Yuvvraaj. at least if you ask me if i give 10/10 to > Taal i will give only 4/10 to Yuvvraaj. ARR should have experimented > in some other low profile album but certainly not in Yuvvraaj. also a > film solely based on music certainly required some instantly classic > music, like Taal. > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Chord" <purevibz@> wrote: > > > > Did anyone read the comments that followed the review? I can't > > believe the ignorance, stupidity, and narrow mindedness of some > people > > out there!!!! > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Sai Theodore" <saitheodore@> > > wrote: > > > > > > http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/oct/21yuv.htm > > > > > >
