> The true fact is you are disapponinted with the music but its only > you.
it is not only me. a proof is comments on the blog we are currently discussing. > they go to him because of the "MASS", CURRENT > MARKET not the "1996 popularity"..and these cant be given only by > Fans but a lot lot more people need to like the music. of course i and everyone here knows this. the point here what we are discussing is that with yuvvraaj ARR could not deliver an album which is as highly liked by the masses as taal, dil se etc. > here is the catch with ARR - The MASS you are talking about is > the "FANS". If ARR fans like it then it already reached the mass. be > assured about it. i don't agree. the masses are not fans. there are lots of his albums which were not liked by masses but of course were liked by his fans. > If you dont like it guess what? I pity you. You are > one of those small..tiny winy group who doesnt likes this..!!!! > sorry!! no Offense i never said i am not liking it, i am only saying it is not one of ARR's bests. and disappoints as album of a Ghai-ARR combo especially after masterpiece Taal. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "arunsoft2k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jahanzeb, > > The true fact is you are disapponinted with the music but its only > you..but there is something called difference of opininion!!! > > a lot of people both here and orkut ARRahman communitiy..liked the > music. well you can always compare with Taal, Dilse, Rangeela. but > really you should spend some time reading the reviews came out when > those were out. I'm sure there will be another "Janhanzeb" trying to > make people understand how Arr disapointed yet again. but outof > nowhere it becomes a classic after a year for some of those. > > I have nothing against your taste...but Here is the most imp point > you migt havs missed!! > 1.ARR is the highly paid music director...paid big bugs!!! > 2."Big deal" producers still trying to get ARR as their film music > director. They wait more time than even a ARR-Fan waiting for ARR's > release. > Do you think the producers like ARRs divine feelings??..or they like > his recording theater,or place where he lives or they liked him > because he composed Roja, Dil se, Rangeela(hahaaaaaa). na na > na..this aint joke!! they go to him because of the "MASS", CURRENT > MARKET not the "1996 popularity"..and these cant be given only by > Fans but a lot lot more people need to like the music. > > but here is the catch with ARR - The MASS you are talking about is > the "FANS". If ARR fans like it then it already reached the mass. be > assured about it.If you dont like it guess what? I pity you. You are > one of those small..tiny winy group who doesnt likes this..!!!! > sorry!! no Offense...you asked for it bro.!! > > dont glue your eyes and ears to your music system with Yuvvraaj > playing..just relax yourslef.focus on your normal day to day life > and have this song played in yoru car,living room when you have > dinner..rom nowhere it hits you like a storm...!! > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Jahanzeb Farooq" > <jahanzebtippu@> wrote: > > > > man you have to accept it. although it is growing on us and we > have > > started liking more compared to the first time, but the fact > remains > > that it is not something liked by the masses. only one song Tu > meri > > dost would be liked by the masses but not the rest. even recent > ARR > > albums had many songs loved by masses (and critics) e.g., Tere > bina, > > Mayya mayya, Barso re (Guru), Pappu, Aditi, Kahin to (JTYJN) etc > etc. > > Furthermore the fact remains that Yuvvraaj does not have even a > single > > song which can be called just mibdblowing or plain awesome as per > the > > ARR standards etc. comparing to Taal it still remains a HUGE > > disappointment, if not for us (ARR fans) certainly it is for > masses. > > the weakest songs of Dil se, Taal or Bombay are still better than > > strongest song/s of Yuvvraaj. > > > > lets analyze it. Mastam mastam is good, it grows, melody is > Rahmanish, > > Sonu is perfect, but again it is not something instantly loved by > > masses. Zindagi is again good but nothing exceptional. it heavily > > relies on vocals, too little music, no traditional ARR interludes > etc. > > Man mohini is very good but alas too short, which is completely un- > > understandable, why did not ARR put a few more minutes to it??? > > strange. Dil ka risha is very good again, orchestra is great. it > would > > be loved more than Zindagi, Mastam, Man mohini by masses. however > it > > is a very situational song, not something you will find people > humming > > or playing on streets etc. Shano shano is one of the weakest songs > of > > ARR ever, people will not find anything special in it. it is not > very > > different than dozens of Pritam and others' songs releasing every > day. > > even Pappu (JTYJN) was far far far far far far better. so at the > end > > the only song remains is Tu muskura which will be liked by the > masses > > but again there is nothing very special in it. it is likable but > not > > something blockbuster etc. it is in the league of recent Tu bin > bataye > > (RDB) and Milo wahan wahan (Ada) though the two were far far > better. > > just think of some of ARR's biggest hits and ask yourself honestly > can > > we compare any of Yuvvraaj's songs with Satrangi, Dil se, Chaiyyan > > chaiyyan (Dil se) Taal se taal, ishq bina, ramta jogi (Taal), > Kehna hi > > kya, Hamma hamma, Tu hi re (Bombay) and those from Rangeela, > Saathiya, > > Lagaan, Roja, Sapnay etc etc or even recent lesser hits rang de > > basanti (RDB), khwaja mere khwaja, azeem-o-shaan (JA) etc and > those > > from Guru etc. and you will get the answer. > > > > hence i am certainly not surprised by the reactions of masses. ARR > > here really disappointed, because of Ghai-ARR combo people were > > expecting something as fantastic as Taal, but there is no > comparison > > between Taal and Yuvvraaj. at least if you ask me if i give 10/10 > to > > Taal i will give only 4/10 to Yuvvraaj. ARR should have > experimented > > in some other low profile album but certainly not in Yuvvraaj. > also a > > film solely based on music certainly required some instantly > classic > > music, like Taal. > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Chord" <purevibz@> wrote: > > > > > > Did anyone read the comments that followed the review? I can't > > > believe the ignorance, stupidity, and narrow mindedness of some > > people > > > out there!!!! > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Sai Theodore" > <saitheodore@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/oct/21yuv.htm > > > > > > > > > >
