Someone wants that ARR should go in same pattern.. They can't understand the
variety of his recent flicks.
Regards
MANAF
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, rakesh kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: rakesh kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [arr] Re: "Rahman has a Divine Face" - Subhash Ghai
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 1:18 AM
Totally agree with you jiban.
We have to look forward. Dil se .. Bombay .. Roja ..are all gems from ARR..
which we all will cherish.. but we should look forward and appreciate gems like
Yuvvraaj which is different and excellent in his own standard.
ARR Rules.. Always
Rakesh
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, jibandevta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in> wrote:
From: jibandevta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in>
Subject: [arr] Re: "Rahman has a Divine Face" - Subhash Ghai
To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 10:50 PM
I stongly disagree with the way Jahanzeb categorising 'class'
for ARR's music..though Dil se, Roja and Bombay are masterpieces
..ARR has grown mature with Lagaan, Swades,JA and Yuvvraaj..
Those who are disqualifying Yuvvraaj music, shows their lack
of knowledge of Western classical music..
Its timne for us to walk with Rahman sir forward rather
getting nostalgic about past glories..
We have to come out of our shell now..
-Jiban
--- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, dian hayati <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> It's true that Dil Se, Bombay, Roja and our boss masterpieces are
the greatest...but to me, I will never compare his work as all of
them are wonderful... .
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dian Hayati Syamsuir | Assistant of Marketing Communication
Manager | PT Kusuma Megahperdana | Kompleks Ketapang Indah Blok B2
No. 21 Jl. KH. Zainul Arifin | Jakarta Indonesia 11140 | p: +6221
6338103 ext 102 | f: +6221 6336651 | www.kusumamegah. com
>
> --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jahanzeb Farooq <jahanzebtippu@ ...> wrote:
>
> From: Jahanzeb Farooq <jahanzebtippu@ ...>
> Subject: [arr] Re: "Rahman has a Divine Face" - Subhash Ghai
> To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 6:49 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> well i sincerely pray that the film becomes a hit. otherwise the
music
> will quickly disappear. barring 2-3 songs the rest do not have a
mass
> appeal.
> now about comparing with Bombay, Taal, Dil Se, ... "for me" it is
> complete nonsense. yuvraaj can never be close to these
masterpieces.
> for me if the above four fall in class 1 of ARR then Yuvraaj falls
in
> class 4. Lagaan, Saathiya, Earth 47, Sapnay, Rangeela etc are
class 2. JA, JTYJN, RDB, Guru etc are class 3. Yuva, kabhi na kabhi
etc fall in
> class 5.
>
> --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, V S Rawat <vsrawat@ > wrote:
> >
> > On 10/29/2008 1:08 AM India Time, _Aaditya(Addy) *COOL*_ wrote:
> >
> > > I had watched that inteview, Mr Ghai said Bombay, Taal and
> Yuvvraaj as
> > > ARR's 3 favourite works. Anyway nice work by Vithur, you are
an
> asset to
> > > this group.
> > >
> >
> > Well, I am ready to accept any brickbats from you guys, but I
have
> to
> > say that Yuvraj music is not at par with Bombay. Even taal
wasn't.
> >
> > Giving it further thought, I feel that Taal/ yuvraaj music are
sort
> of
> > "commercialized" , that is how ghai wanted it to be, whereas all
> Mani's
> > albums have a purity, an innocence, a
> > composed-for- the-listener, -not-composed- for-market feel in
them.
> >
> > Mani is in a class of his own.
> >
> > --
> > V
> >
>
