Kudos to Jiban for saying that !! That email says it all !!
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:48 PM, rakesh kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Totally agree with you jiban. > > We have to look forward. Dil se .. Bombay .. Roja ..are all gems from ARR.. > which we all will cherish.. but we should look forward and appreciate gems > like Yuvvraaj which is different and excellent in his own standard. > > ARR Rules.. Always > > Rakesh > > --- On *Wed, 10/29/08, jibandevta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote: > > From: jibandevta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [arr] Re: "Rahman has a Divine Face" - Subhash Ghai > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 10:50 PM > > > I stongly disagree with the way Jahanzeb categorising 'class' > for ARR's music..though Dil se, Roja and Bombay are masterpieces > ..ARR has grown mature with Lagaan, Swades,JA and Yuvvraaj.. > Those who are disqualifying Yuvvraaj music, shows their lack > of knowledge of Western classical music.. > Its timne for us to walk with Rahman sir forward rather > getting nostalgic about past glories.. > We have to come out of our shell now.. > > -Jiban > > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, > dian hayati <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > It's true that Dil Se, Bombay, Roja and our boss masterpieces are > the greatest...but to me, I will never compare his work as all of > them are wonderful... . > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Dian Hayati Syamsuir | Assistant of Marketing Communication > Manager | PT Kusuma Megahperdana | Kompleks Ketapang Indah Blok B2 > No. 21 Jl. KH. Zainul Arifin | Jakarta Indonesia 11140 | p: +6221 > 6338103 ext 102 | f: +6221 6336651 | www.kusumamegah. com > > > > --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jahanzeb Farooq <jahanzebtippu@ ...> wrote: > > > > From: Jahanzeb Farooq <jahanzebtippu@ ...> > > Subject: [arr] Re: "Rahman has a Divine Face" - Subhash Ghai > > To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 6:49 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well i sincerely pray that the film becomes a hit. otherwise the > music > > will quickly disappear. barring 2-3 songs the rest do not have a > mass > > appeal. > > now about comparing with Bombay, Taal, Dil Se, ... "for me" it is > > complete nonsense. yuvraaj can never be close to these > masterpieces. > > for me if the above four fall in class 1 of ARR then Yuvraaj falls > in > > class 4. Lagaan, Saathiya, Earth 47, Sapnay, Rangeela etc are > class 2. JA, JTYJN, RDB, Guru etc are class 3. Yuva, kabhi na kabhi > etc fall in > > class 5. > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, V S Rawat <vsrawat@ > wrote: > > > > > > On 10/29/2008 1:08 AM India Time, _Aaditya(Addy) *COOL*_ wrote: > > > > > > > I had watched that inteview, Mr Ghai said Bombay, Taal and > > Yuvvraaj as > > > > ARR's 3 favourite works. Anyway nice work by Vithur, you are > an > > asset to > > > > this group. > > > > > > > > > > Well, I am ready to accept any brickbats from you guys, but I > have > > to > > > say that Yuvraj music is not at par with Bombay. Even taal > wasn't. > > > > > > Giving it further thought, I feel that Taal/ yuvraaj music are > sort > > of > > > "commercialized" , that is how ghai wanted it to be, whereas all > > Mani's > > > albums have a purity, an innocence, a > > > composed-for- the-listener, -not-composed- for-market feel in > them. > > > > > > Mani is in a class of his own. > > > > > > -- > > > V > > > > > > > > > -- Farzad Khaleel Webmaster http://rahmaniac.co.nr
