Shawn's approach is a very sound one; I've used it myself.  Having that
staging form means that you can do whatever you want/need to the data there,
and then just push the records that really need updating to CTM:People.
Makes a big difference when you're dealing with thousands of people.

Rick

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Pierson, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> **
>
> That is the way I did it, including defaulting some NULL fields that Remedy
> requires.  I have an escalation that pulls the AD data (via a vendor form)
> into a staging table, which then uses filters to do validations and
> auto-population of some data, then if it passes all the validations, passes
> it into the CTM:People form and all the related forms that need populated.
> It sounds like you already have that, but need to use a LOWER() function in
> your Push Fields that passes the Remedy Login Name field.
>
>
>
> Something else that will be useful for you is to set up another filter to
> find users to automatically disable too.  In my filter to do that, I have:
>
> (( 'userAccountControl' = 514) OR ( 'userAccountControl' = 546) OR (
> 'userAccountControl' = 65538) OR ( 'userAccountControl' = 66050))
>
> The userAccountControl field are set to those values when a person is
> de-activated, so you can create a filter to set them to "Obsolete" in
> CTM:People as well as set Support Staff? To No and remove all their
> permissions.  This helps quite a bit in keeping license costs down because
> you're not wasting licenses by maintaining them for people that are no
> longer with the company.
>
>
>
> Shawn Pierson
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kathy Morris
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:37 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* AD and CTM:People
>
>
>
> **
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> AR System: 7.0.1
>
> Thru workflow, data is passed from Active Directory into Remedy vendor
> tables then thru escalations into Remedy CTM:People. We have users that
> sometimes enter the field values in upper/lower case. Whenever they enter
> uppercase/lower case or leave certain fields BLANK, the record does not get
> into the CTM:People form.  I would like to build workflow that changes the
> case to LOWERCASE and does error-checking on records that come from AD that
> don't make it into the CTM:People form.  Am I approaching this correctly, or
> is there a better way?
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at
> AOL Food <http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001>.
>
> __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> html___
>  Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail>.
> If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
> __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
> html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to