Thanks for talking with BMC, Matt.  Personally, I don't think a development 
standard needs to be enforced at this time, but I think having BMC involved in 
the discussion would be valuable in establishing Database ID development best 
practices.

Jennifer Meyer
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Matt Laurenceau
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 10:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

** First take on current status:
With 7.6.04, Dev Studio enforces field IDs of custom fields to NOT overlap with 
BMC's reserved range.
Follow-ups will come for the plans for the future.
archid is still a

Cheers, Matt


On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Matt Laurenceau 
<matt.laurenc...@gmail.com<mailto:matt.laurenc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi.

Very valuable convo indeed.
I pinged BMC R&D, they'll interact to help on ID governance (proposed or 
enforced).

Thanks, Matt
http://profiles.google.com/Matt.Laurenceau<https://profiles.google.com/Matt.Laurenceau>

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Andrew C Goodall 
<ago...@jcpenney.com<mailto:ago...@jcpenney.com>> wrote:
It would be nice if BMC helped drive that effort!

I like the idea of the prefix - or perhaps some other flag to denote
company creator.

Can someone please explain why the default 536xxxx range is not a good
choice for custom fields - thanks.

Regards,

Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . 
www.jcp.com<http://www.jcp.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Meyer, 
Jennifer L
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 8:26 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

This thread is fascinating.  I think this may be the forum to decide on
a development standard for Database IDs so when we share workflow with
each other, we are all using the same standard.

Jennifer Meyer
Remedy Technical Support Specialist
State of North Carolina
Office of Information Technology Services
Service Delivery Division ITSM & ITAM Services
Office: 919-754-6543<tel:919-754-6543>
ITS Service Desk: 919-754-6000<tel:919-754-6000>
jennifer.me...@nc.gov<mailto:jennifer.me...@nc.gov>
http://its.state.nc.us

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
only by an authorized State Official.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Reiser, 
John J
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 9:20 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

Joe,
 Re. your rant about field IDs needing alphas. That would be a great
idea if
BMC could pull it off.
The range of ID numbers that I use a pulled from the telephone keypad.
TPAG forms all have ids that start 872400000 - 872499999
MRBC forms 672200000 - 672299999 etc
When I get a prefix that would be below 536870912 (that number in burned
into my memory) I add 1 as the left most digit 1536870912 which is still
in
the acceptable range for developers.

The place this has failed me is when I want to reuse a modular
form/workflow
combination and the key field ID starts 8724xxxxx and the modular part
is
looking for a field id of 6722xxxxx.
Makes me want to rethink it and build everything as if it will always
interact with other objects in the system.

---
John J. Reiser
Remedy Developer/Administrator
Senior Software Development Analyst
Lockheed Martin - MS2
The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased
by
me


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Joe 
Martin D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 3:02 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

Yup :-) I think that was when I first learnt the use of archgid..

Unfortunately we found it out at a customer that didn't have a separate
development server.. Fortunately for them though, they had very few
customizations that were lost and were able to redo it within a few
days..
And they still didn't bother to invest in a development server after
that..
Go figure..

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Meyer, Jennifer L
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 2:40 PM Newsgroups:
public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

I remember that upgrade!

Ahh, the good old days.

Jennifer Meyer

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Joe 
Martin D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

David,

There was one version, I think when moving from 4 to 4.5 or somewhere
thereabouts, where Remedy Engineering accidently used the starting
non-reserved range 536,xxx,xxx that messed up some customizations that
were
done using that starting non reserved field ID's. Since that time my
personal preference was never to use that, even if it is a trim field
(line,

box, text) you are creating.. Until then I happily used that range for
those

kind of fields. With the introduction of shared workflow, choosing your
field ID's became even more important even for some trim fields like
text
fields..

So my personal preference was to use the 800,xxx,xxx to 999,999,999
range
but I see nothing wrong with starting from 600,xxx,xxx...

Choosing this higher number deliberately, you can almost guarantee
yourself
that an accidental intrusion by BMC Softwares engineers on the
536,xxx,xxx
in any future patches or releases will not impact your customization..
There

is hardly a chance they would use the 600,xxx,xxx to 999,999,999 range
deliberately..

Cheers

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: David Durling
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 8:43 AM Newsgroups:
public.remedy.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?

Is starting at 600,000,000 just a convention people in the ARS community

have chosen, or is there a real risk of running into a problem by
starting
at the 536,xxx,xxx range the system will use by default if you're
creating a

new form?

According to KA315200, a field range of 536870913 to 2147483647<tel:2147483647> 
can be
used
for ARS 7.1 and 7.5.

David Durling
University of Georgia


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of White, 
> Michael W (Mike)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:20 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?
>
> "I seem to recall that 600,000,000 to 999,999,999 is reserved for
custom
> development.".
>
> We roll our own and use that range.
>
> Mike White
> EMail michael.wh...@verizon.com<mailto:michael.wh...@verizon.com>
> Office 813.978.2192<tel:813.978.2192>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Logan, 
> Kelly
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?
>
> "One. . .Two. . .I think you're right. . ."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Tommy 
> Morris
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?
>
> Yeah, I meant 600 million. I still have trouble counting to 5 so
numbers
> larger
> than that stump me. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Meyer, 
> Jennifer L
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:19 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?
>
> Huh.  I suspect it's the number of digits in your ID that's causing
the
> issue.  I
> seem to recall that 600,000,000 to 999,999,999 is reserved for custom
> development.  Field IDs 599,999,999 and below are for BMC's use, but I
> don't
> recall anything about using IDs above 1,000,000,000.
>
> Jennifer Meyer
> Remedy Technical Support Specialist
> State of North Carolina
> Office of Information Technology Services Service Delivery Division
ITSM &
> ITAM Services
> Office: 919-754-6543<tel:919-754-6543>
> ITS Service Desk: 919-754-6000<tel:919-754-6000>
> jennifer.me...@nc.gov<mailto:jennifer.me...@nc.gov>
> http://its.state.nc.us
>
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North
> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only
by
> an
> authorized State Official.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Reiser, 
> John J
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:03 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: "Outside of Reserved Range" warning?
>
> Hello Listers,
> ARS 7.6.03
> MS SQL Server 2005
> VMWare Windows 2003 Enterprise
> I've been working in the Dev Studio for a while and I keep getting the
> following response when I create fields.
> "You have specified an id for the following fields which is outside
the
> BMC
> reserved range. Do you want to continue?"
> I could see a warning for creating a field inside the range of
reserved
> field ids
> but outside?
> Is there a config setting in Dev Studio to stop this message?
> The field ids that I use are all between 1,587,700,000 and
1,587,711,199
>
> Thanks,
> ---
> John J. Reiser
> Remedy Developer/Administrator
> Senior Software Development Analyst
> Lockheed Martin - MS2
> The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
> Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. -
paraphrased by
> me

________________________________________________________________________
____
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers 
Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers 
Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers 
Are"
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any review,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including any
attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers 
Are"


_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

________________________________

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an 
authorized state official.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to