Sean,
Thanks for your response however I don't think you follow what is occurring.

> "It is status dependent so when the "Status" changes you typically need a new 
> "Status Reason" for why it is in that state."

I change the status from Pending to Assigned the Status Reason clears (as 
expected) THEN select one of the new Status Reasons that I created THEN click 
save.

Upon SAVE The status reason is cleared (not as expected) out by a filter 
related to SLA Hold and OLA Hold.

Also, the customer does not own Change Management just Incident and Problem. 
Also, they do already use Tasks with Incidents.

Ken.


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Garrison, Sean (Norcross)
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Status Reasons for Assigned and In Progress Statuses

The reason it clears it out is because of this:

"It is status dependent so when the "Status" changes you typically need a new 
"Status Reason" for why it is in that state."

You are wanting to use it in the opposite way:

Which is to use "Status Reason" as the actual status of the ticket.  "Analysis, 
Test, etc.".  

When out of the box it doesn't work that way.  

Alternate approaches:

Use "Change Management" if your fix to an incident requires something other 
than a restart.  
Use "Tasks" with Incident management 

Sean




  

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Cecil, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:54 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Status Reasons for Assigned and In Progress Statuses

Sean, 

Thank you for your response. However, that is exactly what I did... I have 
previously added Status Reasons to the Pending Status so I know you need to add 
the data and modify the hidden Status_Reason field on the form.

As I had said, what is happening is that if the Status is either Assigned or In 
Progress, the ' z1D_Status_Reason' and 'Status_Reason' are getting set to null 
upon save (filter).

Is there a good reason that these filters are doing this? Has anyone else used 
Status Reasons for the Assigned and/or In Progress statuses?


Ken.


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Garrison, Sean (Norcross)
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Status Reasons for Assigned and In Progress Statuses

Status Reason is determined from "SYS:StatusReason Menu Items" where 'Form 
Name' = "HPD:Help Desk".  It is status dependent so when the "Status" changes 
you typically need a new "Status Reason" for why it is in that state.  

Keep in mind that the field on HPD:Help Desk is a display only field 
(z1D_Status_Reason)( 1000000881).  There is workflow that sets the underlying 
"Status Reason" field.  Not only do you have to add it to "SYS:StatusReason 
Menu Items" but you also have to add an entry to the hidden "Status Reason" 
(1000000150) field on Incidents.  

Hope that helps ...

Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Cecil, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Status Reasons for Assigned and In Progress Statuses

ITSM 7.6

On Incident, a customer would like to add several Status Reason menu choices 
associated with the Assigned and In Progress Statuses. They intend to use is as 
a sort of sub-status (for example: In Progress with a Status Reasons of 
Analysis, Test, Document Prep, etc)

I have added the Status Reason menu choices and they show up properly. However, 
now I see that there are filters that are clearing the field upon save. I plan 
to disable or work around them.

My question is does anybody know no a good reason why I shouldn't do this... 
why the Status Reason must be cleared out if the Status is either Assigned or 
In Progress?

Has anybody else used the Status Reason with either of those two Statuses?

Thanks,
Ken.



******************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the addressee. If you have received this email in error please 
notify the system manager. Subject to local law, communications (including 
traffic data) with Hubbell may be monitored by our systems [or a third party's 
systems on our behalf] for the purposes of security and the assessment of 
internal compliance with Hubbell policies. This footnote also confirms that 
this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 
www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 
www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 
www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 
www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to