Since it is just for the admins I guess you could change the http/https port daily :)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Jason Miller <jason.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have a way to keep them from using the Admin MT in the future? > When not running large queries but just because they can. And then they > tell their friends and everybody starts using your MT :) > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Tauf Chowdhury <taufc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ** >> Peter, >> We also use the same server group name across environments and use host >> files on our local machines to administer each environment when needed. >> >> In addition to the diagram below, I like having a dedicated mid tier to >> the admin box outside of the user load balancer as well. It helps since a >> lot of forms don't display properly in the WUT anymore. Also, I'm assuming >> you're not allowing unqualified searches on the user facing boxes. I've had >> instances where a user needed to run a query beyond the limit we set so >> having a mid tier pointing to the admin box allows for those one off >> requests as well. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Peter Romain < >> p.romain.arsl...@parsolutions.co.uk> wrote: >> >> ** >> >> To ask a related question to anyone that has done this already – do you >> build all the AR Servers with the same hostname then use the hosts file on >> each server to resolve the name back to itself? >> >> This way there’s no need to edit any configurations if the server is >> cloned. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [ >> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] *On Behalf Of *Dean >> van Deventer - Business Connexion >> *Sent:* 31 July 2014 15:55 >> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG >> *Subject:* Re: Server Groups - Your thoughts please. >> >> >> >> ** >> >> <image001.jpg> <http://rkshs01.bcx.co.za/rs/25dkoFBy> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Brad >> >> Where is your mid tiers ? do you have load balancers to ensure your HA ? >> >> >> >> My end picture would look like this bellow >> >> >> >> You would need a load balancer to ensure your HA >> >> Load all boxes exactly the same you can move the functions with the >> rankings >> >> Only allow server 1 and 2 to be available via the LB for user access your >> 3rd server could still perform the actions you set out for it to >> perform. So even if server 3 is struggling your users won’t be affected. >> >> Without the LB you won’t really have HA, with the picture below you could >> actually reboot server as you wish and your users won’t have any impact. >> >> My 5c o >> >> >> >> <image002.png> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [ >> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] *On Behalf Of * >> BradRemedy >> *Sent:* 31 July 2014 11:38 AM >> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG >> *Subject:* Server Groups - Your thoughts please. >> >> >> >> ** >> >> Firstly, thanks for any help you guys can offer. >> >> >> >> We are busy upgrading to ITSM 8.1 and want to setup server groups to >> ensure we have HA in our environment. Currently on our live environment now >> we have a single live server which makes us a little nervous. Our DB is a >> clustered DB with a separate instance handling just reporting. This keeps >> unnecessary traffic off our live DB which is only for Remedy. >> >> We are looking at having the following architecture setup: >> >> >> >> [image: Setup.JPG] >> <https://communities.bmc.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/2-454538-69950/Setup.JPG> >> >> So Remedy Live App Server 1 and Server 2 are both Physical Servers. The >> Remedy Mail and Escalation Server is Virtual Machine server. We wanted to >> keep escalations and mail processing off our mail servers and wanted them >> to rather focus on providing a ITSM and SRM Service to our users. >> >> What I want to know, is the above possible ? Do I need to install the >> ITSM and SRM applications on the *Remedy mail and escalation server* for >> it to work or can I just do a Remedy 8.1 Core installation? Do I also need >> to include it in the server group but with its only job as processing mail >> and escalations or can I keep it out the server group?. >> >> >> >> Also, If I setup the setup group with just the App server 1 in it for >> now, can I turn off the "Administration Server" option and use it as normal >> and only activate the Administration option when we add in the second >> server to the server group at a later stage ? >> >> >> >> Are there any problems with the above plan or something I am missing? >> >> >> Any advice is appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ >> >> >> >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ >> >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ >> > > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
