Jason,
Configure tomcat realms. Then you can have a popup like login just for
that midtier. Its like htaccess is for Apache.
http://wiki.metawerx.net/wiki/SecuringYourSiteWithContainerManagedSecurity
Regards
Danny
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jason Miller" <jason.mil...@gmail.com>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: 31/07/2014 16:28:51
Subject: Re: Server Groups - Your thoughts please.
**
Since it is just for the admins I guess you could change the http/https
port daily :)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Jason Miller <jason.mil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Do you have a way to keep them from using the Admin MT in the future?
When not running large queries but just because they can. And then
they tell their friends and everybody starts using your MT :)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Tauf Chowdhury <taufc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
**
Peter,
We also use the same server group name across environments and use
host files on our local machines to administer each environment when
needed.
In addition to the diagram below, I like having a dedicated mid tier
to the admin box outside of the user load balancer as well. It helps
since a lot of forms don't display properly in the WUT anymore. Also,
I'm assuming you're not allowing unqualified searches on the user
facing boxes. I've had instances where a user needed to run a query
beyond the limit we set so having a mid tier pointing to the admin
box allows for those one off requests as well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Peter Romain
<p.romain.arsl...@parsolutions.co.uk> wrote:
**
To ask a related question to anyone that has done this already – do
you build all the AR Servers with the same hostname then use the
hosts file on each server to resolve the name back to itself?
This way there’s no need to edit any configurations if the server is
cloned.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Dean van Deventer -
Business Connexion
Sent: 31 July 2014 15:55
To:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Groups - Your thoughts please.
**
<image001.jpg>
Hi Brad
Where is your mid tiers ? do you have load balancers to ensure your
HA ?
My end picture would look like this bellow
You would need a load balancer to ensure your HA
Load all boxes exactly the same you can move the functions with the
rankings
Only allow server 1 and 2 to be available via the LB for user access
your 3rd server could still perform the actions you set out for it
to perform. So even if server 3 is struggling your users won’t be
affected.
Without the LB you won’t really have HA, with the picture below you
could actually reboot server as you wish and your users won’t have
any impact.
My 5c o
<image002.png>
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of BradRemedy
Sent: 31 July 2014 11:38 AM
To:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Server Groups - Your thoughts please.
**
Firstly, thanks for any help you guys can offer.
We are busy upgrading to ITSM 8.1 and want to setup server groups to
ensure we have HA in our environment. Currently on our live
environment now we have a single live server which makes us a little
nervous. Our DB is a clustered DB with a separate instance handling
just reporting. This keeps unnecessary traffic off our live DB which
is only for Remedy.
We are looking at having the following architecture setup:
So Remedy Live App Server 1 and Server 2 are both Physical Servers.
The Remedy Mail and Escalation Server is Virtual Machine server. We
wanted to keep escalations and mail processing off our mail servers
and wanted them to rather focus on providing a ITSM and SRM Service
to our users.
What I want to know, is the above possible ? Do I need to install
the ITSM and SRM applications on the Remedy mail and escalation
server for it to work or can I just do a Remedy 8.1 Core
installation? Do I also need to include it in the server group but
with its only job as processing mail and escalations or can I keep
it out the server group?.
Also, If I setup the setup group with just the App server 1 in it
for now, can I turn off the "Administration Server" option and use
it as normal and only activate the Administration option when we add
in the second server to the server group at a later stage ?
Are there any problems with the above plan or something I am
missing?
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"