Now wait a minute. If his father is in fact dead, then that is complete asshole
statement,
and completely uncalled for. Very cheap shot.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> >
> He's climbing that stairway to heaven to see his Daddy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, you may have a point there.
> > But trying to save Asbury isn't a crime, and he seems to be a
> pretty humble guy in my
> > opinion. I sincerely doubt his is look for personal gains by
> wanting all the credit.
> > Hey, are we ever going to discuss anything else here besides Jim
> Keady. This is getting to
> > be a bit boring.
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <asburydogma@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Because something like that should be dicussed and researched.
> It's s
> > > knee-jerk re-action. Jim Keady is like a goalie in soccer he
> stands
> > > there alone with all the answers. He will never change. He wants
> to
> > > be the Lone Ranger. He wants to save Asbury his way, he wants all
> the
> > > credit.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, you may be right.
> > > > Only question I have then is why is voting it down the
> responsible
> > > thing?
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is Jack if making that motion (that he knows can
> not
> > > be
> > > > > passed) is somehow showing support for the West Side, isn't
> he
> > > > > putting his fellow councilmembers, who have to do the
> responsible
> > > > > thing and vote it down, in the postion of being mistaken for
> > > people
> > > > > who have no commitment to the West Side?
> > > > >
> > > > > That's why it's such a dirty trick.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish JK would address that issue on this board.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With all due respect, I disagree. I saying that he was
> trying
> > > to
> > > > > show a greater commitment,
> > > > > > no a "trick" Please don't mince my words.
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I son't think you meant to Jack, but your post below
> actually
> > > > > agrees
> > > > > > > with me that it was just a trick Keady was pulling.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyone else have an answer here?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe JK himself would like to weigh in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Perhaps he was hoping to show the west side a greater
> > > > > commitment
> > > > > > > from the town. Is that
> > > > > > > > so wrong?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm going to reserve decision on something JK did
> last
> > > night
> > > > > > > until I
> > > > > > > > > hear from those on this board that support him.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Someone please tell my why...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Last night with all the people there to complain
> about
> > > the
> > > > > > > east/west
> > > > > > > > > racial divide, with all the high tension about waht
> is or
> > > is
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > being done on the West Side, why did Jim Keady,
> without
> > > > > warning
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > other council members, in front of all, suddenly make
> a
> > > > > motion
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > hand the West Side Community Center $100,000.00?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Before you answer, here's some things I do know:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1. Jim Keady is the Chair, and Rev. Nunn a member, of
> the
> > > > > > > > > Springwoond Avenue Advisory Committee.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2. That Committee, after a year of work, is about 1
> month
> > > > > away
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > a issuing a report for West Side redevelopment. 1
> month
> > > > > away.
> > > > > > > It is
> > > > > > > > > supposed to be a very comprehensive plan that will
> deal
> > > with
> > > > > > > > > recreation issues.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3. The City does not own the West Side Community
> Center,
> > > a
> > > > > > > private
> > > > > > > > > Company does.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 4. With no application sitting in front the Council,
> no
> > > > > plans,
> > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > drawings - nothing - it would be reckless to just cut
> a
> > > > > private
> > > > > > > > > company $100,000.00 of public money on a motion with
> no
> > > > > hearing.
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > any other private company received a $100,000.00
> donation
> > > of
> > > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > > money, there would certainly (rightfully) be public
> > > outrage
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > calls to the prosecutor for investigation.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Here is what I think: JK was pandering. He knew full
> > > well
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > not a chance in the world that his motion would or
> even
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > voted on.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > JK wanted the people who were there to say the West
> > > doesn't
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > enough, see him ask for $100,000.00 for them, and see
> the
> > > > > rest
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the council say no.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That would make him look good, at the cost of stoking
> the
> > > > > fires
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the geopgracphic, economic and racial divide. That
> was
> > > pure
> > > > > > > > > political pandering to make him look good even though
> it
> > > > > hurt
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > relations among the City's people.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That's my theory, but I said I'd reserve decision.
> If
> > > that
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > why he did it,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Someone, please, tell me why...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
