Tommy, You're a pice of work! I had to laugh at your last line! It's
priceless! It's the "Not in My BackYard", syndrome! We profess to be
christians, when we are a bunch of hypocrites! Granted; Asbury Park,
seems to be the "dumping ground", for all the ills, of Monmouth
County. It's really, UNFAIR! If I say, put it in Freehold, you'd see
nothing but illegal aliens, there! If you TRY to put it in Neptune,
the people, there will say, "What do you think, this is..."Asbury"?
I can SEE them! Arrogant A$$! Long Branch, already has Rev. Kevin,
so THEY don't need another mission, so WHERE? Belmar? Bradley Beach?
How's about Ocean Township? I'll bet they raise their hackles there,
too! Just some thoughts.
Sharon
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kevin the issue is not whether to help, rather where to help and who
> should provide it.
>
> With over 80 non-profits and 39 churches all helping the poor,
> Asbury Park has done enough.
>
> Don't give me this holy rhetoric about moral responsibility - don't
> you dare - not when the other 51 Monmouth County towns aren't
> kicking in any where near the help we are, and some not at all.
> We've done more than our share.
>
> Also, Jesus never put a shelter full of pedophiles, who will be
> released at 7:00 am, in the path of children walking to school.
>
> Where is your moral responsibility towared those kids?
>
> If moral responsibility is measured by assitance to the poor, then
> Asbury Park is the Mother Theresa of Monmouth County.
>
> Go spread your moral indignation in a town in Monmouth that isn't
> helping the poor. How about we put this mission next to you know
> who's parent's house in Belmar? See if he would support it then.
>
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Brown" <jerseykev@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Tommy, criminal behaviour is not a factor in the overall decision
> to
> > allow services for the needy. Jesus never rejected a soul.
> Ministry
> > is charged with aiding those in need. If the liberal court system
> > weren't releasing these individuals back into society there would
> be
> > no public threat. To cease support because among the masses there
> > are those that intend evil upon another is like shutting down the
> > asbury park government because former councilman Hamilton was
> > arrested for taking a bribe. You can not corporately punish a
> > segment of community because a handful in the community are evil.
> >
> > As for me being happy that asbury wouldn't have a mission, with
> the
> > inuendo that our ministry in Long Branch would have
> more "business"
> > is another flaw in defense of the objection of the asbury facility.
> >
> > It is incumbent upon every municipality to provide services for
> all
> > it's citizens. The attitude that it would draw people into Asbury
> is
> > noted, however the reason that may occur is because other
> communities
> > are not being held responsible for the needs within their own
> > jurisdiction. Until the State begins to provide shelter for
> homeless
> > people statewide, more importantly shelter services are profitable
> > operations, they are charity driven.
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
