I'm with you on this one Tom.  I don't understand the rationale 
(legally) around letting students in this district go to other 
district's public schools.  Requiring those students to go to APH of 
pay for private would improve the overall diversity of the school 
while increasing the focus on improvements not just from parents in 
AP but parents and taxpayers from the entire district.  

A lawsuit from the school board to re-visit this "avoid Asbury Park 
High" policy is both appropriate and would have a good chance of 
success.





--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oak you have taken my ball and run onto a whole different field 
with 
> it.  In fact, you are not even playing the same sport with my ball.
> 
> NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING in any of my posts has to due with 
> inequality in funding.  NOTHING.  
> 
> My topic is that we are sending the white kids away from their 
HOME 
> district.  Get that?  Their HOME district.  That's why I call 
> it "reverse busing."  
> 
> I understand people don't like busing when it is taking kids away 
> from their home district, to a foreign district, to create racial 
> balacne in the foreign district.  I understand that is 
objectionable.
> 
> If that is objectionable, so is busing kids AWAY FROM THEIR HOME 
> DISTRICT therefore creating the segregated district at home!
> 
> Why not make all the kids stay in their home district? They're 
> making your kid do it Oak, but the kids in the Asbury District are 
> given this special privilege to avoid AP.
> 
> This decision was race based. It is the only one like it.  It was 
> done with a particular purpose, which if you look at the 
enrollment, 
> worked.
> 
> None of the matters you cite overturned Brown.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <oakdorf@> wrote:
> >
> > TD: Lsats are June 11. Can't wait.
> >  
> > Given the true facts, I see no reason why the schools in NJ are 
> not 
> > funded equally. Again, TD, at what point are things considered 
> equal?
> > Is it the point every kid from an Abbott district gets into a 
> college 
> > of their choice or gets straight A's, what about the white kids 
> from 
> > the lawsuit driven rural Abbott Districts? 
> > 
> > Tell me - what is equal? beer on me. (then we'll be equal)
> > 
> > Another bit:
> > http://www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/1003/article/501
> > ....Instead of relying on these explicit constitutional 
> guarantees, 
> > the Court chose to compromise and used sophistic social science 
in 
> a 
> > legal case that would cripple the education and lives of 
millions 
> of 
> > black children for generations to come. 
> > 
> > With all due respect to Judge Damon Keith (a jurist of the 
highest 
> > order) this gala event tomorrow [May 17, 2003] celebrating the 
> Brown 
> > v. Board of Education case, is a terrible tragedy, not because I 
> > don't believe that black people should be allowed to attend 
school 
> > with whites. I am a black man--born and raised in Detroit and 
> > attended Detroit public schools with white children from K-12. 
> > However, to celebrate a court case such as Brown, which is 
> obviously 
> > not based on a single judicial precedent, diminishes the 
> Constitution 
> > that every American should put its faith in to uphold. 
> > 
> > In 1954, there was a Faustian bargain made among the eight 
voting 
> > members of the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress, the President, as 
> well 
> > as every court in America, every political leader, every public 
> > school, private school, law school, university, academy, and 
every 
> > responsible American citizen. To give legitimacy to Brown v. 
Board 
> of 
> > Education, is to sacrifice lawful constitutional due process and 
> > sound constitutional jurisprudence for the expediency of the 
> public 
> > policy fiction, which the Brown opinion solidified in American 
> > culture--that is, that black children must be allowed to attend 
> > public school with white children in order to get [equally] 
> educated. 
> > 
> > This type of misguided public policy presupposes that black 
> people, 
> > prior to 1954, were totally uneducated, ignorant and, just 
waiting 
> > for Masser to open up the school house door so us poor negroes 
can 
> > finally get educated by going to school with the white folks! 
Ms. 
> > Taylor, the hateful assumptions Brown makes about our people 
> should 
> > be publicly denounced by all rational persons of any race, class 
> or 
> > creed. 
> > 
> > In the final analysis, I hope that you will read the selected 
> > passages on the Brown opinion in my book, The Inseparability of 
> Law 
> > and Morality: The Constitution, Natural Law and the Rule of Law 
> > (University Press of America,); mtownsend@, or 
> > http://www.univpress.com.
> >
>




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/hOt0.A/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to