I stand corrected, but it still seems excessive. On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 15:06 -0600, Alex Robar wrote: > Not necessarily... The same agents could very well be providing > support for multiple companies. You wouldn't want an announcement from > company A in company B's queues. > > Alex > > On 1/3/07, Joe Dennick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, get a Business Process specialist to analyze the > client's > environment and develop a better solution. 200 queues with > only 100 > agents sounds pretty ludicrous to me! > > On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 14:22 -0600, lenz wrote: > > Hello list, > > one of our clients is going to be deploying a system with > over 200 > > differently composed queues and 100 agents. We are going to > do a full test > > of the viability of this solution before deployment, but I > was wondering > > if anyone has experience of such a setup and if there are > any obvious > > problems or no-nos. > > Any suggestion welcomed, > > l. > > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > -- > Alex Robar > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users