* Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-23 14:45]:
> On 5/23/05, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-23 13:30]:
> > > -1 to "atom:byline", should anyone propose it.
> > 
> > We already have pretty good consensus that bylines, if needed
> > by anyone, will be implemented in an extension, not in Atom. 
> 
> Is your name Tim or Paul? If not, please avoid declaring what
> the consensus is. It only causes problems. Trust me on this.

Sorry; it is not for me to determine whether the thus far 8 +1
votes in favour of punting any byline element to an extension
constitute a consensus.

In any case, the point was that it clearly doesn’t look like
anyone is trying to propose such a thing, so we should please
stick to the points that are actually being discussed.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle

Reply via email to