Lindsley Brett-ABL001 wrote:
I have a suggestion that may work. The issue of defining what is "prev"
and "next" with respect to a time ordered sequence seems to be a
problem. How about defining the link relationships in terms of time -
such as "newer" and "older" or something like that. That way, the
collection returned should be either "newer" (more recent updated time)
or "older" (later updated time) with respect to the current collection
doc.
Wouldn't it be "better" to share the same link relations between feeds
sorted by date/time or some other "priority" (e.g. OpenSearch results)?
--
Thomas Broyer
