Friday, March 31, 2006, 4:34:48 AM, you wrote:
> The escaped HTML content contained within the content element that > David was originally concerned with is more than likely a copy of > all or part of the elements and content contained inside the body > tag of the external document referenced by an associated link > element, and therefore no guarentee that the xml:base of the atom > feed is going to be anywhere even close to accurate. That might be exactly the case where the xml:base is useful: the content came from different places, had relative URI-refs, so the xml:base was set on each entry to the source URIs of each document so that the relative links work[*] in both in cases. [*] in theory. -- Dave
