On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:20 PM, James M Snell wrote:
I would agree that, as a best practice, the xml:base should appear on
the content element, but implementations need to be prepared to use
whatever the in-scope URI is (e.g. if no xml:base is specified,
relative
refs in the content will be relative to Content-Location or the feeds
Request URI).
Maybe. Highly error-prone.
In other words, consumers of the feed *have* to assume
that the current xml:base in context is going to be correct and
publishers of the feed simply have to be responsible for Doing The
Right
Thing.
Agreed. I think providing an xml:base in your feed is a best
practice. -Tim
