(although, I had already been convinced of this by the rest of you as well)
On 3/31/06, Tim Bray <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:20 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> I would agree that, as a best practice, the xml:base should appear on
> the content element, but implementations need to be prepared to use
> whatever the in-scope URI is (e.g. if no xml:base is specified,
> relative
> refs in the content will be relative to Content-Location or the feeds
> Request URI).
Maybe. Highly error-prone.
> In other words, consumers of the feed *have* to assume
> that the current xml:base in context is going to be correct and
> publishers of the feed simply have to be responsible for Doing The
> Right
> Thing.
Agreed. I think providing an xml:base in your feed is a best
practice. -Tim
--
<M:D/>
M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com/
