Re: Gauging interest in another 3d audio project
@12 Thank you for the references, I'll have to read up on that when I have some time. My convolution based approach uses slightly larger impulses (200 frames) since that's what the dataset contained, but if I can reduce that without noticeable differences in quality, it's always a bonus. It sounds pretty good at least to my ears, but of course there's always room for improvement.
Regarding the Apache license, I am not a lawyer so of course I can't be 100% certain that my understanding is correct, but the following quote can be found here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
Section 4d of the license provides for attribution notices to be included with a work in a NOTICE file, such that the attribution notices will remain, in some form, within any derivative works. Apache projects MUST include correct NOTICE documents in every distribution.
It's not quite clear to me whether this applies to derivative works distributed in binary form, but that's what it sounds like.
In any case, best of luck with your efforts. But to answer your original question, if you do pick the Unlicense or something similarly liberal, I'm most definitely interested.
Kind regards,
Philip Bennefall
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
