amey01;232189 Wrote: > > But there is just so much that science and DBT tests (which have been > proven inaccurate) can't explain. >
Money quote from this forum IMO. Science has been scientifically proven to be wrong. But if it was proven scientifically, then maybe it wasn't proven after all and science isn't wrong. But then... DBT has limitations, sure--the results are truly valid only for the tested environment and test subject. If the environment is wonky or the subject pool is nonrepresentative, then DBT results cannot be extrapolated to apply to the real world. But that's why information on methodology is included in the published results, so that people can pick it apart and point out problems, and the test can be re-run correctly. That's the science part of DBT--it's self-correcting. Or are you saying DBT doesn't work on dogs and bats because science stops working at 20KHz? -- CatBus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CatBus's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7461 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38596 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
