Gazjam;543288 Wrote: > Did I say that? > Uhm..no, Im not being that technical or that specific. :) > > What Im saying is that there is a good jump in sound quality to my ears > in my system (and lots of other User opinions seem to agree)using the > Touch than there was with the SB3. > My Dac/system is transparent enough to show up differences in digital > transports...and its not that the SB3 is crap all of a sudden - its > very much not...its just that to me the Touch is a lot better. > > Dont even think about it - buy a Touch. :)
Have to admit i was making assumtions, but IMHO, the major source of audible differences originating from digtal domain is our old enemy jitter. Also youre indicating that there is a difference between SB2 and SB3. Isn't the SB3 just SB2 in new housing? Anyway: your thoughts an experiences are valued. Thanks PS! Have connected the Beresford Caiman to my old friend the SB2, and there is a quite noticable difference in sound: Midrange opens up, more "air" in the top and overall a more dynamic presentation. The slight tendency towards digital harshness from the SB2 is also gone. Other components: Electrocompaniet ECI-3, Monitor Audio Silver 7 -- stone ------------------------------------------------------------------------ stone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3440 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78036 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
