soundcheck;626365 Wrote: > One more: > > When testing different SRCs and options I think everybody should > exactly know what the DAC is doing in that area. > Many of the DACs around do some kind of resampling. Some do it with > multiples > of the original others not. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be useless to > do > resampling to 88,2 or 96 on SBS if the DACs SRC does it again to even > higher rates. > > Beside that - at least that's my experience - higher load on the SB > environment due to HiRes data has it's own effects. > > After all, all those differences should be rather subtle. > I guess it's not gonna be that that easy to nail it down. IMO too > many parameters in the game. > > I'll give a try. ;)
some things to think about: 1) some dacs internally upsample to 384 or 768 using ASRC chips - for these it may make little difference to upsample before the Touch, but... 2) some people believe that driving the s/pdif link (transmitter+cable+receiver) at 96kHz is a good idea. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Belden Digital,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84462 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
