SBGK;680392 Wrote: > > > People who like the SBGK with jivealsa at 45 and loadavg at 50, do you > still find these settings acceptable ? my view was that the sound was > different because so much of the top end had been reduced, but > interesting that some are still sticking with it. > > for instance at low level volume, you normally get the mid and highs > and then have to crank up the volume to get the bass going. With SBGK > 45/50 settings the bass is prevalent and you have to crank up the > volume to get the top end going. not normal behaviour, at least in my > system. > >
OK. Answering this question will require in-depth listening for a long while to a variety of different music -- and at different volume levels! So far, I have discovered that some tracks do sound a bit high-frequency shy. The overall tonal balance, though, seems overall still better than your latest (Dec. 27) version. But time will tell -- maybe. ;-) Now, if you could only come up with this bass quality + a bit better treble extension . . . But thanks again for sharing your work! Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge->Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player->Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance->WiFi Bridge->Squeezebox Touch->Toslink->Cambridge Azur 840C DAC->Adcom GFP-750 preamp->Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp -> Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033->REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)->Little Dot Mk III amp->AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch->Grado SR125 headphones ------------------------------------------------------------------------ guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
