jh901 wrote: > I'd recommend the Beatles mono box set. The original '87 CDs are stereo > mixes (which are not definitive) and were poorly mastered. I'm not sure > why you would listen to The Beatles only for "nostalgia" though!? We > don't pop on Beethoven or Mozart for nostalgia do we? > I rejected the stereo remasters because my ears and DR Database showed them to be dynamically compressed compared to the 87 EMIs and original LPs. But I understand the latest monos lack that added compression ... are they really a big advance? The reason for my hesitation is that many raved about the initial stereo remasters even though clearly they were worse in a very audible aspect! I don't want to pay for something just because it un-ruins the second last remaster, he-he.
Can you elaborate? Ta, Darren Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98249 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
