Archimago wrote: > It'll be interesting how this gets addressed since it's such a flagrant > deficit! I mean, taking the 16-bit file, amplify by 0.1dB in a 24-bit > container to make it sound a little louder and "better"!? Add a little > temporal misalignment to we can't directly compare without a little > work... Something doesn't smell right!
Probably in response to people discovering that the FLAC encoder "wasted bits" feature shows null-padding unless masked with some processing. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103091 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
